+1 nginx+uWSGI
On Tuesday, October 8, 2013 7:16:42 AM UTC-5, Andréas Kühne wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering, which server would be best for a production environment.
> Nginx or apache? At the moment we are running both, nginx for static files
> and apache + mod_wsgi for django. But in the futu
+1 nginx+gunicorn
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Mando wrote:
> +1 nginx+uWSGI
>
>
> On Tuesday, October 8, 2013 7:16:42 AM UTC-5, Andréas Kühne wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was wondering, which server would be best for a production environment.
>> Nginx or apache? At the moment we are running bot
If you are doing any of the hundred-odd things that Apache can do an Nginx
cannot, then you will need to use Apache. But, if all you are doing is
serving static files and handing all heavy lifting to django, then Nginx
with uWSGI will do everything you need, and will do it with less resources.
+1 Nginx
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Valder Gallo wrote:
> +1 nginx
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Andreas Kuhne
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was wondering, which server would be best for a production environment.
>> Nginx or apache? At the moment we are running both, nginx for static
+1 nginx
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Andreas Kuhne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering, which server would be best for a production environment.
> Nginx or apache? At the moment we are running both, nginx for static files
> and apache + mod_wsgi for django. But in the future we will be moving o
Hi,
I was wondering, which server would be best for a production environment.
Nginx or apache? At the moment we are running both, nginx for static files
and apache + mod_wsgi for django. But in the future we will be moving our
static assets to S3 and cloudfront, so the reason for using nginx for t
6 matches
Mail list logo
