That clears it up perfectly. This is great to have working, thanks
again!
Greg
On Jun 9, 10:19 am, "Russell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Greg Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Wonderful, I'll be able to test this pretty extensively tonight.
>
>
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Greg Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Wonderful, I'll be able to test this pretty extensively tonight.
>
> Since I don't think it's documented either way, is there a particular
> procedure I should abide by when dumping/reloading fixtures for the
> parent and
Wonderful, I'll be able to test this pretty extensively tonight.
Since I don't think it's documented either way, is there a particular
procedure I should abide by when dumping/reloading fixtures for the
parent and child models? In my case, the parent is in one app, and the
child is another. Do I
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:12 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:06 PM, Greg Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Much appreciated, Russ! I was not sure whether I was doing something
>> wrong or not, this is good to know this is being looked at. I tinker
Excellent news, I appreciate it very much!
On Jun 9, 8:12 am, "Russell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:06 PM, Greg Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Much appreciated, Russ! I was not sure whether I was doing something
> > wrong or not, this is good to know
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:06 PM, Greg Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Much appreciated, Russ! I was not sure whether I was doing something
> wrong or not, this is good to know this is being looked at. I tinkered
> with a fix for a while but ultimately fell flat on my back for lack of
> experi
Much appreciated, Russ! I was not sure whether I was doing something
wrong or not, this is good to know this is being looked at. I tinkered
with a fix for a while but ultimately fell flat on my back for lack of
experience with Django internals. Let me know if I can assist with
testing or provide m
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:09 AM, Greg Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've submitted a bug about this since I haven't been able to turn up
> any kind of response. In the mean-time, I've had to rig something up
> with generic relations to serve the same purpose. It's a really nasty
> kludge,
I've submitted a bug about this since I haven't been able to turn up
any kind of response. In the mean-time, I've had to rig something up
with generic relations to serve the same purpose. It's a really nasty
kludge, I think, which is a shame. I can't believe this hasn't cropped
up with anyone else
I've been looking through the source to try to see if there is any
indicator as to whether this is the intended behavior. If nobody
speaks up today, I'll file a bug, as it would appear to be.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
It seems like multi-table sub-classed models (not abstract) don't
honor the "pk" being specified in fixtures. For example, I have an
Event class that is sub-classed by a Race model. The Event class is in
an app called "calendar" and the Race model is in an app called
"regattas". I dumpdata regatta
11 matches
Mail list logo
