Well, on the surface this works. I'm sure if anything unexpected
happens I'll be back.
On Sep 17, 8:34 am, ringemup wrote:
> Sure, it's easy enough to find out if it works in a general sense --
> but I'm also concerned about running into subtle bugs down the road,
> and having to restructure my
Sure, it's easy enough to find out if it works in a general sense --
but I'm also concerned about running into subtle bugs down the road,
and having to restructure my entire database as a result.
On Sep 17, 4:15 am, bruno desthuilliers
wrote:
> On 16 sep, 22:11, ringemup wrote:
>
> > Is it pos
On 16 sep, 22:11, ringemup wrote:
> Is it possible for a model to inherit from an abstract model, which in
> turn inherits from a non-abstract model?
I don't thinks so, but I may be wrong. Now nothing prevents you from
trying by yourself, it shouldn't take long to find out !-)
--
You received t
Is it possible for a model to inherit from an abstract model, which in
turn inherits from a non-abstract model?
Here's an example. In this case, the reason for using multi-table
inheritance rather than an explicit one-to-one relation would be that
the office addresses would be editable via office
4 matches
Mail list logo
