Hi Mark,
Thank you for your question, I might actually do the same. I just had
issues on a model with 2 M2M relationships (one using an intermediary
table, one without).
I would just caveat what James Schneider said, there are some differences.
My simply M2M relationship threw me Field Requir
Hello Mark,
The only downside I can think of is that you won't be able to create
relationships from the m2m managers, you'll have to create the
relationship directly instead.
This isn't such a big issue if you plan on adding fields later to
the intermediary model later on anyway.
You can read mo
On Dec 19, 2017 1:53 PM, "Mark Phillips" wrote:
Is there any downside to creating a through table in a many to many
relationship when there isn't any "extra" related data, but there might be
in the future?
I have read that migrating from a simple m2m relationship to a m2m with a
through table ta
Is there any downside to creating a through table in a many to many
relationship when there isn't any "extra" related data, but there might be
in the future?
I have read that migrating from a simple m2m relationship to a m2m with a
through table takes some jumping through hurdles, so I am consider
4 matches
Mail list logo
