Re: Great article about web2py

2008-04-29 Thread mdipierro
I updated the document. Let me know if I am missing something else. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscri

Re: Great article about web2py

2008-04-29 Thread mdipierro
OK, will add the references you mention. Some questions/comments: Why isn't the custom Q object for left joins part of Django? or is it? The fact that Django uses a template language that is not written in python and that you can cache it, does not mean Django qualifies as a full YES under my de

Re: Great article about web2py

2008-04-29 Thread Joseph
With respect to using py2exe to compile Django app, refer these two: http://www.jjude.com/index.php/archives/70, ideas which I borrowed heavily from http://www.silverstripesoftware.com/blog/archives/51 Ofcourse I didnt compile the templates. Joseph On Apr 29, 9:14 pm, mdipierro <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Great article about web2py

2008-04-29 Thread Rajesh Dhawan
Hi, > About Left Outer Joins: > > Would the use of a custom Q object in Django to perform a LEFT OUTER > JOIN require programming in raw SQL or can it be done programming with > the ORM API only? In the first case it does not count as explained in > the document. In the second case I will be happ

Re: Great article about web2py

2008-04-29 Thread Kumar McMillan
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:14 AM, mdipierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyway, if you post an example of a Django bytecode compiled > application and documentation on how to create and deploy it, I will > amend my document to reflect that. If a feature is not tested and not > documented it d

Re: Great article about web2py

2008-04-29 Thread mdipierro
About Left Outer Joins: Would the use of a custom Q object in Django to perform a LEFT OUTER JOIN require programming in raw SQL or can it be done programming with the ORM API only? In the first case it does not count as explained in the document. In the second case I will be happy to amend the s

Re: Great article about web2py

2008-04-29 Thread ydjango
Article states... "Web2py and J2ee are the only frameworks that allow byte code compile applications and distribute them in closed source" I read somewhere that "cx_Freeze" can be used to do the same for any python app including those based on Django . I have not used cx_freeze, but intend to do

Re: Great article about web2py

2008-04-29 Thread Rajesh Dhawan
Here are a couple of comments on your slides: 1. Slide: "web2py and j2ee are the only frameworks that allow to byte code compile applications and distribute them in closed source." You can distribute Django applications too with just the .pyc/.pyo compiled files instead of the .py sources. Furth

Re: Great article about web2py

2008-04-29 Thread Rajesh Dhawan
On Apr 29, 9:57 am, mdipierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually, the document is not linked to the web page yet because I am > hoping to get comments and corrections from the different communities. > I admit bias in the choice of comparables and topics but I decide the > target audience. Nev

Re: Great article about web2py

2008-04-29 Thread mdipierro
Actually, the document is not linked to the web page yet because I am hoping to get comments and corrections from the different communities. I admit bias in the choice of comparables and topics but I decide the target audience. Nevertheless I would like to the document to be accurate. If I say som

Re: Great article about web2py

2008-04-28 Thread g m
HAI On 4/29/08, simonbun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It's beyond me why they would classify PHP as a web framework, and on > top of that, include CakePHP in the comparison as well... Other than > that, it's hardly an independant and unbiased review, coming from the > authors of web2py themsel

Re: Great article about web2py

2008-04-28 Thread g m
HAI On 4/28/08, Milan Andric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This is not Django specific but it is framework relevant. I thought > this was a great writeup of features for any framework. At least I am > one person who likes the features of this web2py framework. > > http://mdp.cti.depaul.edu/ex

Re: Great article about web2py

2008-04-28 Thread simonbun
It's beyond me why they would classify PHP as a web framework, and on top of that, include CakePHP in the comparison as well... Other than that, it's hardly an independant and unbiased review, coming from the authors of web2py themselves. A thing that does seem handy is their integrated ticketing

Re: Great article about web2py

2008-04-28 Thread kamil
thanx interesting On Apr 28, 6:19 pm, Milan Andric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is not Django specific but it is framework relevant.  I thought > this was a great writeup of features for any framework.  At least I am > one person who likes the features of this web2py framework. > > http://md

Great article about web2py

2008-04-28 Thread Milan Andric
This is not Django specific but it is framework relevant. I thought this was a great writeup of features for any framework. At least I am one person who likes the features of this web2py framework. http://mdp.cti.depaul.edu/examples/static/web2py_vs_others.pdf Web2py makes development happen f