> It's a generic templating language, it's not particularly geared toward HTML.
> It's no HAML (you'll still get to write all the HTML yourself), but writing
> custom tags is much easier than with Django. Also, it compiles templates to
> Python code, which makes it reaaally fast.
fast is always g
> Emm - I've looked at Mako, though it doesn't look too far off from
> normal
> template HTML **at first glance** (I'm sure I've barely skimmed the
> surface).
It's a generic templating language, it's not particularly geared toward HTML.
It's no HAML (you'll still get to write all the HTML yours
kg - Nothing special about it I don't like, it's just that I find the
HAML/GHRML
syntax very clean and readable. It's a matter of taste, I suppose :)
Emm - I've looked at Mako, though it doesn't look too far off from
normal
template HTML **at first glance** (I'm sure I've barely skimmed the
surfa
Hi there,
> I found a similar template language called GHRML (http://
> www.ghrml.org) for django, but the documentation on it is very scarce.
> It's also very young (currently in v0.11), and I'm not sure if it's
> even being actively developed anymore. I'm trying to find out if it
> supports bas
On Sunday 14 June 2009 10:24:52 gte351s wrote:
> I'm trying to learn how to work with django after working with ruby on
> rails for some time (not too long). Rails has a nice template language
> called Haml (http://haml.hamptoncatlin.com/), which I find much more
> readable than regular HTML. It i
I'm trying to learn how to work with django after working with ruby on
rails for some time (not too long). Rails has a nice template language
called Haml (http://haml.hamptoncatlin.com/), which I find much more
readable than regular HTML. It is also indent oriented, which all
python fans must find
6 matches
Mail list logo
