I had to make a similar argument at my job. You are going to have to
convince
people who are rightly skeptical, wont appreciate the all the core
technological arguments,
and really only care about time and cost.
So, make a business case, not a technical case. Focus on:
1) tangible business bene
> boss care about the technology, as long as it works. They will
> not pay for an upgrade of the back-end to newer technology,
> unless I can back up this decision with valid points. So why
> should they switch to something like Django? I can come up
> with technological points, such as maintainab
Microsoft ditched classic ASP.
"It's unsupported" usually carries some weigth as an argument with bosses.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to dj
ASP will cost more. Windows Servers are more expensive, not to mention the
developer studio costs. What database backend are they using? If it is MS
SQL then there is another large cost that could be removed by using Postgre
or MySQL. Then just slip it to them that Google uses Python, not Microsoft
Ok I need some thoughts on the following. For a client, we need to
redesign their website. The back-end was coded a couple of years ago
in classic ASP. It's fairly complex, with a webshop, uploading and
parsing of excel files with new collections of clothing, and stuff
like that. It took people ab
5 matches
Mail list logo
