On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 15:20 -0700, John-Scott wrote:
> All,
>
> I had previously been using a bit of a hack (thought I found examples
> of this on the mailing list, but can't find any evidence now) so that
> I could actually associated field specific errors with the actual
> field instead of hav
All,
I had previously been using a bit of a hack (thought I found examples
of this on the mailing list, but can't find any evidence now) so that
I could actually associated field specific errors with the actual
field instead of having everything stuffed into __all__ /
non_field_errors.
The hack
2 matches
Mail list logo
