Try nginx and uWSGI instead of fcgi. http://projects.unbit.it/uwsgi/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-users+
I'll give that a try
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options,
I've been running nginx with fcgi and it works ok but the memory use is
higher than I'd like.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, se
Perhaps a cheerypy/python based webserver? (So you only need one process)
On 18 March 2011 17:35, Shawn Milochik wrote:
> I use gunicorn with nginx, albeit on a much more powerful machine.
>
> I think you'll find nginx or lighttpd recommended for a lightweight server.
>
> --
> You received this
I use gunicorn with nginx, albeit on a much more powerful machine.
I think you'll find nginx or lighttpd recommended for a lightweight server.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@goo
I have been working on a fun-plug distribution of debian for my dlink
dns-323 nas and I've been writing the web interface using django which works
fine except I need to get it running with something other than the
development server.
My question is what is the best web server combo with the low
6 matches
Mail list logo