Re: Django in low memory environments

2011-03-19 Thread Matt Robenolt
Try nginx and uWSGI instead of fcgi. http://projects.unbit.it/uwsgi/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+

Re: Django in low memory environments

2011-03-18 Thread Dwight
I'll give that a try -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options,

Re: Django in low memory environments

2011-03-18 Thread Dwight
I've been running nginx with fcgi and it works ok but the memory use is higher than I'd like. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, se

Re: Django in low memory environments

2011-03-18 Thread David Markey
Perhaps a cheerypy/python based webserver? (So you only need one process) On 18 March 2011 17:35, Shawn Milochik wrote: > I use gunicorn with nginx, albeit on a much more powerful machine. > > I think you'll find nginx or lighttpd recommended for a lightweight server. > > -- > You received this

Re: Django in low memory environments

2011-03-18 Thread Shawn Milochik
I use gunicorn with nginx, albeit on a much more powerful machine. I think you'll find nginx or lighttpd recommended for a lightweight server. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@goo

Django in low memory environments

2011-03-18 Thread Dwight
I have been working on a fun-plug distribution of debian for my dlink dns-323 nas and I've been writing the web interface using django which works fine except I need to get it running with something other than the development server. My question is what is the best web server combo with the low