Re: Django & Apache 1.x

2006-07-06 Thread Carlos Yoder
> in short: > > 1. yes, it works without it. if you dig deep enough at > code.djangoproject.com, i think you can find some kind of fcgi.py which > is afaik a stripped-down flup, or something like that. > 2. the servage.net's answer is stupid :) [snip snip snip] > i hope this (chaotic) explanatio

Re: Django & Apache 1.x

2006-07-06 Thread Gábor Farkas
Carlos Yoder wrote: > * Important * > > Does anyone know if Django will run on a config with Apache 1.x + > FastCGI, but without flup? At servage.net they just told me that they > don't support flup "because of high memory usage", so I don't know > what to do. > > I'll be most obliged if anyone

Re: Django & Apache 1.x

2006-07-06 Thread Carlos Yoder
* Important * Does anyone know if Django will run on a config with Apache 1.x + FastCGI, but without flup? At servage.net they just told me that they don't support flup "because of high memory usage", so I don't know what to do. I'll be most obliged if anyone can clarify this quickly... thanks a

Re: Django & Apache 1.x

2006-07-05 Thread gabor
PythonistL wrote: > Gabor, > what trafic do you have at your website and what server configuration > do you use? I am asking that because you use FastCGI and I had big > problems with FastCGI when there was highload.So I decided to move to > mod_python and no problem since > Regards, > L hi, th

Re: Django & Apache 1.x

2006-07-05 Thread PythonistL
Gabor, what trafic do you have at your website and what server configuration do you use? I am asking that because you use FastCGI and I had big problems with FastCGI when there was highload.So I decided to move to mod_python and no problem since Regards, L --~--~-~--~~~-

Re: Django & Apache 1.x

2006-07-05 Thread Carlos Yoder
> I am not a doc wizard, but IMHO it is *always* worth addressing doc > issues re set up that are ambiguous and make one wonder how to get > started. I think most open source projects vastly undersestimate how > important ease of entry is to their growth. This encompasses both how > easy it is to

Re: Django & Apache 1.x

2006-07-04 Thread Iain Duncan
>>Well... Mod_python is the easiest method of running django, FastCGI >>setup is more advanced and usually requires basic knowledge about >>forking vs. threading, writing init scripts etc. These are things that >>makes it harder for beginners to understand Django itself so in my >>opinion it's go

Re: Django & Apache 1.x

2006-07-04 Thread Gábor Farkas
Carlos Yoder wrote: >>> Can anybody confirm having a Django app running under Apache 1.x + >>> FastCGI? Is this actually a silly question, since let's say Dreamhost >>> gives only Apache 1.x support? :-) >> i have a website served by apache 1.x + fastcgi. no problems. >> >> gabor > > Thank you ve

Re: Django & Apache 1.x

2006-07-04 Thread Carlos Yoder
> > Can anybody confirm having a Django app running under Apache 1.x + > > FastCGI? Is this actually a silly question, since let's say Dreamhost > > gives only Apache 1.x support? :-) > > i have a website served by apache 1.x + fastcgi. no problems. > > gabor Thank you very much, or should I say

Re: Django & Apache 1.x

2006-07-04 Thread Gábor Farkas
Carlos Yoder wrote: >>> Hello people! >>> Since I only found *one* place stating that Django "requires Apache >>> 2.x and mod_python 3.x", I felt I should check :-) >>> Just to be absolutely sure... Django does NOT work under Apache 1.x, >>> correct? > >> Not correct. This 2.0 thing is mentioned

Re: Django & Apache 1.x

2006-07-04 Thread Carlos Yoder
> > I wonder if more people were/are confused by that sentence (found > > here: http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/install/)...? > > Well... Mod_python is the easiest method of running django, FastCGI > setup is more advanced and usually requires basic knowledge about > forking vs. threadi

Re: Django & Apache 1.x

2006-07-04 Thread Ivan Sagalaev
Carlos Yoder wrote: > I wonder if more people were/are confused by that sentence (found > here: http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/install/)...? Well... Mod_python is the easiest method of running django, FastCGI setup is more advanced and usually requires basic knowledge about forking

Re: Django & Apache 1.x

2006-07-04 Thread Carlos Yoder
>> Hello people! >> Since I only found *one* place stating that Django "requires Apache >> 2.x and mod_python 3.x", I felt I should check :-) >> Just to be absolutely sure... Django does NOT work under Apache 1.x, correct? > Not correct. This 2.0 thing is mentioned because Django works under > mo

Re: Django & Apache 1.x

2006-07-04 Thread Ivan Sagalaev
Carlos Yoder wrote: > Hello people! > > Since I only found *one* place stating that Django "requires Apache > 2.x and mod_python 3.x", I felt I should check :-) > > Just to be absolutely sure... Django does NOT work under Apache 1.x, correct? Not correct. This 2.0 thing is mentioned because Dja

Django & Apache 1.x

2006-07-04 Thread Carlos Yoder
Hello people! Since I only found *one* place stating that Django "requires Apache 2.x and mod_python 3.x", I felt I should check :-) Just to be absolutely sure... Django does NOT work under Apache 1.x, correct? I'm tring to setup a Django env at Servage.net, and they provide Apache 1.x, mod_pyt