Just for the record: ANDing 2 Q-objects doesn't work either...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe
I'm working from the top of my head here (I'm at work), but wouldn't
ANDing two Q's be a solution? I remember having constructed a QuerySet
of two Q's &'ed together, as in qs = (Q() & Q()), and then evaluating
qs.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message be
On Sun, 2006-08-13 at 21:23 +, cyberco wrote:
> Ai, really? I'm a n00b when it comes to SQL and the SQL statement of a
> chained filter (as listed by connection.queries) is about 8 (!) lines
> of SQL abacadabra.
There's a worked example here:
http://www.pointy-stick.com/blog/2006/06/14/custom
Ai, really? I'm a n00b when it comes to SQL and the SQL statement of a
chained filter (as listed by connection.queries) is about 8 (!) lines
of SQL abacadabra. Sure there is no other way to solve this issue? Will
the bug be fixed in the next release?
--~--~-~--~~~---~
On Sun, 2006-08-13 at 12:31 +, cyberco wrote:
> Having:
> ___
>
> class Pizza(models.Model):
> name = models.TextField()
> toppings = models.ManyToManyField(Topping)
>
> class Topping(models.Model):
> name = models.TextField()
> ___
>
> ...and for instanc
Having:
___
class Pizza(models.Model):
name = models.TextField()
toppings = models.ManyToManyField(Topping)
class Topping(models.Model):
name = models.TextField()
___
...and for instance having toppings 'tomato' and 'cheese', how do I
select all pizza's with
6 matches
Mail list logo
