This is a real problem. I have had the same issue, and I have seen several
other people besides yourself bring this up without getting satisfactory
answers.
I was having the same problem where __init__ was being called but not
render, where the purpose of the tag is to insert several variables
And you are absolutely correct, using a local variable in the render
method and not rebinding self,ip resolves the problem. Thank you very
much. Can you explain why this is?
On May 23, 5:34 am, bruno desthuilliers
wrote:
> On May 23, 5:37 am, stevedegrace wrote:
>
> > I developed
; (less expensive) or the comment.
>
> Brice Leroy
>
> On May 23, 2011, at 1:34 AM, bruno desthuilliers
> wrote:
>
> > On May 23, 5:37 am, stevedegrace wrote:
> >> I developed a custom tag to look up the country of a certain IP
> >> address using an IP to c
I developed a custom tag to look up the country of a certain IP
address using an IP to country database. It's sort of rough and ready,
but it should work. The idea is that you read the comment.ip_address,
feed it to the {% country %} tag, which then spits out the two letter
country code. The intere
Thanks guys!
On Aug 30, 10:56 pm, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 9:37 PM, stevedegrace wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
>
> > I'm making a refback type linkback app for my hobby CMS. I want to
> > find all the unique page targets. I am thinking broadly of a
Hi guys,
I'm making a refback type linkback app for my hobby CMS. I want to
find all the unique page targets. I am thinking broadly of a couple of
ways to do it. One with the ORM sort of line this:
targets = list(set([linkback.target_url for linkback in
LinkBacks.objects.all()]))
This seems lik
I just discovered something I did not expect.
Apparently a Django template does not behave like its context is a
single global scope where if you set a new variable using a custom
template tag it can be accessed anywhere subsequently in the template.
Variables you set into the context initially
I don't think I'm understanding this very well. By doing some
inspection, I see that Apache is running under two PIDs, which makes
sense because ServerLimit right now is set to 2. What I'm wondering
is, does each of those processes have a persistent instance of Django
in its own python process wai
t,
dispatch_uid='comments.post_comment')
comment_was_flagged.connect(flag_comment, Comment,
dispatch_uid='comments.flag_comment')
On Feb 15, 8:46 pm, stevedegrace wrote:
> I realise going through Google that this has been hashed over before,
> but nevertheless, I want to know if there i
I realise going through Google that this has been hashed over before,
but nevertheless, I want to know if there is any new thought on this.
Ever since I removed project references from imports in my code, I
have noticed a new problem whereby many functions connected to signals
are being called twi
I think I might have bitten off more than I can chew here, heh, and I
need some help. I just finished my project and it looks awesome on my
computer at home (running Ubuntu Intrepid). But before I deployed it,
I decided I didn't like the retarded name I gave the project and I
wanted to change it.
Nov 30, 10:26 am, stevedegrace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another problem! I'm using Django 1.0.2, Python 2.5.2, on Ubuntu 8.10.
>
> I have a structure of keys and keyrings arranged in a tree of
> arbitrary depth which I decided to implement as a bunch of models:
> Root
Another problem! I'm using Django 1.0.2, Python 2.5.2, on Ubuntu 8.10.
I have a structure of keys and keyrings arranged in a tree of
arbitrary depth which I decided to implement as a bunch of models:
RootKeyRing, RootKey, SubKeyRing, SubKey (rather than as XML like
maybe I should have done) becau
correct. So I'm happier this morning. :)
On Nov 29, 10:12 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 17:37 -0800, stevedegrace wrote:
> > I have a weird problem. (I'm using Django 1.0.2, Python version 2.5.2
> > on Ubuntu 8.10).
and I'm just finishing up a nice
little library for working with particular tree structures of
arbitrary depth, the crown of which is this nice little recursive
control structure I'm making. Everything else has been great, the
parser kills me!
On Nov 29, 9:37 pm, stevedegrace <[EM
I have a weird problem. (I'm using Django 1.0.2, Python version 2.5.2
on Ubuntu 8.10). Say I have a template like this:
"""
{% sometag %}
Some stuff
{% someothertag %}
Some more stuff
{% yetanothertag %}
Last stuff
{% endsometag %}
"""
My template tag function looks something like this:
@registe
On Nov 19, 12:04 am, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
[...]
> (5) Using reverse() is often a lot more explicit than a writing the URL
> out in full. Which of these is more immediately readable?
>
> (a) /blog/archives/full-text/%s/ % (input1,)
>
> (b) reverse("full-ar
Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 19:46 -0800, stevedegrace wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > I'm hoping someone more experienced with Django will explain the
> > rationale for the preferred paradigm and show me where I have gone
> > astray
Hi guys,
So, I'm learning Django for the first time and having fun, I really
like it. Generally I'm finding it very practical and blessedly well-
documented, especially compared to other Python frameworks I have
explored. I'm using it for a personal project of mine that I wanted to
do in python (
19 matches
Mail list logo
