thout understanding how it is made
available in the first place.
- Shane
On Apr 11, 11:04 am, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:23 AM, sh...@bogomip.com
> wrote:
> > IMHO (which is very H) _filter_or_exclude should be public. I can't
> > find a compel
I often have to filter or exclude based on a search boolean. Writing
duplicate code for both queries or selecting which of the two
functions using my own function feels horribly repetitive since a
function doing exactly that exists in the base model query manager.
IMHO (which is very H) _filter_o
On Nov 23, 6:42 pm, Christophe Pettus wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2010, at 5:40 PM, sh...@bogomip.com wrote:
>
> > Without test data I'm not sure where the trade offs are with the
> > following. However it should improve the ability to look up items
> > that reference a c
I've recently started using the following approach when attempting to
reduce the size of ManyToManyField type reference tables. Currently
I'm working on implementing this in a limited fashion into my own
work. I would like to share what I'm working on with you all and see
if it's worth a reaction
4 matches
Mail list logo
