On 8/24/06, Rasjid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your project is now bookmarked, and time allowing I hope to be able to
> contribute.
I would be very glad to incorprate into Zmaj any changes and modules
You provide me with. :) Every contribution is welcome. :)
--~--~-~--~~
On 8/24/06, didier Belot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> About the service app: it is very distribution specific!
Yes, I know :-/ I'm one of http://www.atomixlinux.org developers, and
because of that I don't have time to test it on other Linux
distributions (Atomix is derived from Fedora)... The pla
On 8/24/06, didier Belot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the libuser that's imported in zmaj.users.views.py ?
It's a python library that implements a standardized interface for
manipulating and administering user and group accounts. It's developed
by RedHat, but can be found for every linux
On 8/24/06, Sean Schertell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey this sounds like a great project! Any plans to integrate mail
> user and ftp user management?
Yes, there is a plan to integrate mail and ftp user management. It
will be the part of the SMTP and FTP server configuration. But there
is a lo
http://code.google.com/p/zmaj/
is an application for Linux system administration. It's intended to be
replacement for Webmin (Yes, a big bite, I know... But I concluded
that it's easyer to write the whole application from scratch then to
learn Perl and write modules for Webmin ;)
Currently 4 mod
Glenn Tenney wrote:
> As a friend of mine reminded me, part of your perception feeding that
> conception is that you're still thinking of these as being columns in
> a table... when in fact they are classes derived from FormField (and
> you can derive your own classes from FormField or even from o
Ok, I still think that its conceptually wrong to have two completely
different sorts of objects shareing the same name... But You're the
bosses ;)
Thanks for the time.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro
Hi everyone,
Before starting I want to give one Hip Hip Hooray for the m-r branch :)
Now to start ;).
There is one thing that bugs me with the naming convention in Django.
All classes in the django/forms have the same *Field* ending, which is
100% OK because they really are fields.
But also
Hello,
1. Why are the generic views from list_detail package different from the views from create_update package.
When I use create_object or update_object, I have to pass to it
{'model' : MyModel} dict, but when I use object_list I have to do:
from django.db.models.query import QuerySet
info_
9 matches
Mail list logo
