I'm working on a Universal Feed Parser-based library to create
aggregators. The idea is that the process of parsing a feed and syncing
it's items with a database can be customized by various addins:
http://github.com/miracle2k/feedplatform
It mostly works already, though it lacks the polishing
Todd,
I recommend that you have a look at Coffin:
http://github.com/dcramer/coffin
It comes with a {% url %} that should work out of the box.
The snippets you linked are not tags, but functions, that is, you
would do something like:
{{ url('my_view') }}
You need the pass the functions in
> form.category.queryset =
> Category.objects.filter(blog__exact=request.user.author_set.all()
> [0].blog) print form.category.queryset
I am somewhat surprised that this would work at all. The field objects
should be accessible via
FormClass.base_fields['fieldname']
or
form_instance.fields['fi
> So I guess I'm just curious to hear how other members of the
> community have solved this. Are people slipping business logic into
> the model classes for the most part?
If what I need to write doesn't really fit in any of the common
"places" (models, managers, views, middleware etc.), then I
On Apr 23, 10:29 pm, Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the django docs I see that you can easily make a foreign key by
> referencing the model:
>
> manufacturer = models.ForeignKey('production.Manufacturer')
>
> ...but it feels like maybe stepping outside the "django way."
You can also just i
> How can I create passwords protected feeds with Django? I guess I
> will have to go beyond the contrib.feeds framework, but if some one
> has any recipes/links to how to do this, it would be most helpful!
Use your own custom view to render the feed, and just wrap HTTP auth
around it. There
> subtasks = tasks.exclude(part_of__exact='None')
> returns the correct subset, with the "top" tasks omitted. Why?
'None' is a string, so if anything, you'd have to use: part_of__exact=None
However, what you're looking for is probably:
subtasks = Task.objects.filter(part_of__isnull=True)
Mic
> I'm sure I'm not the only person who has come across
> this problem
I ran into this yesterday:
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/6533
Might be related?
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou
> gallery application, and I have several uses who can post their
> galleries to this application. Is there a way to create permission on
> a per-user basis.
There apparently was some work on a per-object permissions branch in the
past, but it looks pretty dead:
http://code.djangoproject.co
> I'd like to override the save() method and within it I'd like to test
> if a value has changed, that is, if that value as stored in the
> object (in memory) is different from what is actually stored in
> database.
Another approach is using __getattr__ to monitor changes. It saves you a
qu
> There's no other way to set it?
Just set the labels *before* calling super().
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googl
> def save(self): if self.pk: ...=> being created else: ...=> being
> updated
>
> I vaguely remember seeing a parameter for the save method which would
> do that, but I can't find it. Any thoughts?
That's the correct way to do it, unless you want to use signals:
http://www.martin-geber.com
>> There is 'post_save' signal with 'created' parameter. But,
>> unfortunately, this feature is undocumented...
>
> It's something related with "dispatcher" class? Please let me know if
> there is more about signals than the code below. I simply just use
> this;
If you use post_save instead
> but the page seems to load forever and I'm stuck!
I'm pretty sure I ran into this before, and IIRC it's because Django's
runserver, which I assume you are using, can only handle one request at
a time - try a different test url.
Michael
MariusB schrieb:
> I'm trying to take a link as an arg
I'd probably put it in my models file.
Michael
Thomas Guettler schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> our customer wants to display the username as 'username: firstname
> lastname'
>
> The easiest way would be to overwrite User.__unicode__. But where
> should you put code like this? Up to now I put it in our mid
James Bennett schrieb:
> Manually call get_template() or select_template(), and stuff the
> resulting Template object into a module-global variable somewhere.
> Then just re-use it, calling render() with different contexts, each
> time you need it.
Is there anything speaking against building that
Rob Hudson schrieb:
> If I understand correctly, these cache the templates after they have
> been rendered. What I'm curious about is if there is a way to cache
> templates before they are rendered so you can provide different
> contexts to them. It seems like there would still be some gains
Andrew schrieb:
> That's a good thought, but unfortunately that's not the way multiple
> inheritance works... only the first method in the chain gets called.
>
> On Dec 15, 6:54 am, Michael Elsdörfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>> class Description(ChangeImple
> class Description(ChangeImplementor, models.Model):
I might have a flaw in my logic, but if you were to switch the bases,
inherit from models.Model first, and implemented a save() in
ChangeImplementor, models.Model.save() should be called first, create
the row, and by the time ChangeImpleme
I just spent the last 5 hours debugging this, what a nightmare ;)
I recently updated from around rev. ~5600 to the latest trunk. Before
the update, I was doing this:
# wrap render method
MyFormClass.base_fields['fieldname'].widget.render =
new.instancemethod()
...
myform = MyFormClass()
..
> It's an oversight; I hadn't thought of that case. You're right, marking
> render() output as safe should be the right thing to do. If you'd care
> to open a ticket so this doesn't get lost, I'll fix it tomorrow or
> during the sprint on the weekend.
Thanks Malcolm:
http://code.djangoproject.co
I just updated to an auto-escaping enabled trunk, and I'm trying to
adjust some template tags. One of them stores a nodelist and renders
it at some point.
Now, NodeList.render() returns escaped data, but does not mark it as
safe (it's a unicode instance). Is this just an oversight, or as
designed
22 matches
Mail list logo
