Re: Strange query when using annotate and count

2017-12-06 Thread Cristiano Coelho
necessary group by, or if this simply a bug El miércoles, 6 de diciembre de 2017, 10:28:22 (UTC-3), Cristiano Coelho escribió: > > After testing for a while, there really doesn't seem to be a good way to > do this. . > > Annotation is required since the query is filter

Re: Strange query when using annotate and count

2017-12-06 Thread Cristiano Coelho
that ends up almost adding 3 times more database query time do to the horrid count query generated. El viernes, 24 de noviembre de 2017, 18:04:21 (UTC-3), Cristiano Coelho escribió: > > Hello Simon, > > You are right, the score is really not meant to be attached so a custom &g

Re: Strange query when using annotate and count

2017-11-24 Thread Cristiano Coelho
gt; way easier and provide help for users in the situation as you. > > Best, > Simon > > Le vendredi 24 novembre 2017 08:14:10 UTC-5, Cristiano Coelho a écrit : >> >> Hello Simon, >> >> That private API is good to know, but now that I think of it would still >

Re: Strange query when using annotate and count

2017-11-24 Thread Cristiano Coelho
n you are >>> performing your `count()` because some annotations could interfere with >>> grouping >>> somehow. >>> >>> There is an open ticket[0] to add support for an `alias()` method that >>> would >>> allow the ORM to clear/ignore

Re: Strange query when using annotate and count

2017-11-23 Thread Cristiano Coelho
that > would > allow the ORM to clear/ignore the specified expressions if it's not > referenced > in the query. > > In the mean time I think the best approach would be to avoid annotating the > queryset if your don't need to reference the score. > > Cheers

Re: Strange query when using annotate and count

2017-11-21 Thread Cristiano Coelho
Hmm, should I try with the dev mailing list? Guess it's something no one faced before? El martes, 14 de noviembre de 2017, 22:54:23 (UTC-3), Cristiano Coelho escribió: > > I'm getting some very odd query when combining annotate with count. See > the f

Strange query when using annotate and count

2017-11-14 Thread Cristiano Coelho
I'm getting some very odd query when combining annotate with count. See the following: >>> q = > Vulnerability.objects.annotate(score=WordTrigramCustomSimilarity('test','summary')) > >>> q.count() > 3094 > >>> print connection.queries[-1] > 'SELECT COUNT(*) > FROM ( > SELECT "vulnerabilitie

Re: About channels and scaling up

2017-08-06 Thread Cristiano Coelho
ls release, but it's going > to take a little time. > > Andrew > > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 4:21 AM, Cristiano Coelho > wrote: > >> About docs here: http://channels.readthedocs.io/en/stable/deploying.html >> >> "The fundamental difference is that th

Django Channels and multiple servers

2017-08-06 Thread Cristiano Coelho
For some reason my original question got lost. http://channels.readthedocs.io/en/stable/deploying.html I don't quite understand this part: The fundamental difference is that the group mechanic requires all servers serving the same site to be able to see each other; *if you separate the site u

About channels and scaling up

2017-08-06 Thread Cristiano Coelho
About docs here: http://channels.readthedocs.io/en/stable/deploying.html "The fundamental difference is that the group mechanic requires all servers serving the same site to be able to see each other*; if you separate the site up and run it in a few, large clusters, messages to groups will only