Re: Improving performance of lighttpd, flup and django-fcgi.py combo

James Bennett wrote: > On 4/6/06, jtm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does this combination of software mean that for every request > > django is starting from scratch and having to re-import everything? > > No, pretty much the whole point of FastCGI is that you have a > long-running process which

Re: Improving performance of lighttpd, flup and django-fcgi.py combo

On 4/6/06, jtm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does this combination of software mean that for every request > django is starting from scratch and having to re-import everything? No, pretty much the whole point of FastCGI is that you have a long-running process which handles lots of requests, rather

Improving performance of lighttpd, flup and django-fcgi.py combo

Hi, I've just got lighttpd running under Mac OS X 10.3.9 and I am using Georg Bauer's django-fcgi.py as the dispatcher. django is .91. The machine I am running it on is, admittedly, pretty lightweight (G4 400 MHz, 832MB), but I have not seen much improvement over the development server. The pag

Re: extend User in m-r

You can extend the user model in m-r using a ForeignKey with edit_inline, num_in_admin=1, max_num_in_admin=1, and unique=True. This is what my dev team uses to add additional fields to users. Conceptually, a OneToOneField would probably make more sense, but it seems that OneToOneField is still be

Re: extend User in m-r

Hi Arthur,If I will use OneToOne then in admin it wolud be not possible to edit users, which is not in 'myusers' ( using edit_inline) and if disable edit_inline then I sholud edit 'myusers' in to places one in 'users' and then in 'myusers'. in that case better to use 'ForeignKey' or may be it is ex

update_object generic view should take manipulator?

I'm still somewhat new to django, so I'm trying to figure out if this is a good idea, or a warning that I'm headed in the wrong direction. It would seem highly useful to me if the update_object and create_opject generic views could also take an additional keyword argument for the manipulator clas

Re: SQLite thread access

Hi John. I wanted a bit more flexibility in a development server so adapted the cherrypy wsgi server to work with Django. In order to use SQLite, I modified my cherrypy config to use a single thread. Also I had to be sure that if I was calling the connection to execute raw SQL, I made sure to

SQLite thread access

Hi, I searched both mailing lists but didn't find any reference to the following, hence my post. I have written an application that starts a new thread, and as this thread is executing I want to save data to the database. This worked when I used postgreSQL, but it failed when I used SQLite. Th

Re: extend User in m-r

hi michael. inheritance is not working yet in magic-removal. the confusing thing about it is you can create the class and the table does get created, but when you access the same class later in your python code, it will be treated as the super class (User in your case). Extending User is a very

Re: Help with performance?

On 4/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well, yeah. But bascially a three-line Python script with a simpleget_list(), returning two small elements, should not be taking seven seconds.I am not surprised about it. One of the three line you are talking about is something like from djan

extend User in m-r

Hi all! What would be the best way to extend User class? subclassing makes another table and wiki -> http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/models/subclassing/ different from m-r. remove_fileds dosen't work and in admin it is possible to add info to new class but not to modify it: from djang

Re: Help with performance?

Well, yeah. But bascially a three-line Python script with a simple get_list(), returning two small elements, should not be taking seven seconds. I think there's some more basic problem here such as my sever just being too small/slow/weak. But I'm looking forward to your Wiki contribution -- I hav