Re: Bug in Swedish ordinal messages

2013-05-18 Thread Horst Gutmann
On Saturday, May 18, 2013 11:23:05 PM UTC+2, claudep wrote: > > Le samedi 18 mai 2013 à 22:54 +0200, Horst Gutmann a écrit : > > Hi :-) > > > > Yes, I saw that but I'm not completely agreeing here due to one > > detail: I totally agree that localisations should not be tested, but > > with th

Re: Bug in Swedish ordinal messages

2013-05-18 Thread Claude Paroz
Le samedi 18 mai 2013 à 22:54 +0200, Horst Gutmann a écrit : > Hi :-) > > Yes, I saw that but I'm not completely agreeing here due to one > detail: I totally agree that localisations should not be tested, but > with the ordinal tag we are actually talking about functionality that > depends on the

Re: Bug in Swedish ordinal messages

2013-05-18 Thread Horst Gutmann
Hi :-) Yes, I saw that but I'm not completely agreeing here due to one detail: I totally agree that localisations should not be tested, but with the ordinal tag we are actually talking about functionality that depends on the i18n system and there exists a test for the English version of it. Given

Re: Bug in Swedish ordinal messages

2013-05-18 Thread Claude Paroz
Le samedi 18 mai 2013 à 07:38 -0700, Horst Gutmann a écrit : > Hi :-) > > There is currently a bug in the Swedish ordinal messages for > django.contrib.humanize which is documented here: > https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/20441 > > The patch includes the changes messages and should probably

Bug in Swedish ordinal messages

2013-05-18 Thread Horst Gutmann
Hi :-) There is currently a bug in the Swedish ordinal messages for django.contrib.humanize which is documented here: https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/20441 The patch includes the changes messages and should probably be duplicated in Transifex. apollo13 suggested that - if possible - one o