Re: FSFE-defined coding standards?

On 15 February 2021 19:38:56 UTC, krey...@rixotstudio.cz wrote: >Now i lost around 2 months of my life working on this (me and group >members were working on this before the group was requested) [...], >but for now i no longer want to be affiliated with FSFE. Please consider operating as a Free-

Re: FSFE-defined coding standards?

Hi, Am 16.02.21 um 12:42 schrieb MJ Ray: > Please consider operating as a Free-Software-supporting association > outside of FSFE, so the work and members are not all lost. > > FSFE does good but is not the Messiah. The basic concept of a > Foundation (special status for founders and founding proc

FSFE and promoting software quality

Hello, I went through the long thread "FSFE-defined coding standards". Did not read all the mails in this thread as at the end it deviated from original topic. I developed software for different domains and I do not think it is a good idea to promote one-fits-all approach for coding standards.

Re: FSFE and promoting software quality

Hi Vitaly, Am Mittwoch 17 Februar 2021 09:25:29 schrieb Vitaly Repin: > I think that FSFE can focus on promoting open source as a way to improve > software quality. this is one of the aspects FSFE promotes for the reasons you have outlined. If we come up with other practical guidelines, even for

Re: (F)LOSS stock trading?

Hello, Am Donnerstag 04 Februar 2021 03:25:22 schrieb Jacob Hrbek: > Looking for a (F)LOSS alternative to Robinhood > [] a software product could be the app, but for real transactions to work, you'd need a broker (some sort of banking service). It would be quite co