Innovation, funding and FS (was: to git or not to git)

Hi Andreas, Am Donnerstag 13 September 2018 17:05:41 schrieb Andreas Nilsson: > By the phrasing "leading provider" I assume that it means a company > that won't share the software innovations with the rest of the > community so that all can benefit. yes. > If this is the case then I would sugge

Re: to git or not to git

Hi Andreas, On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 17:05:41 +0200 Andreas Nilsson wrote: > > If this is the case then I would suggest to seperate out the parts > that makes Github and others to have an upper hand and then see how > the parts can be countered using free software and free innovation. I wrote a blog

FSFE and censorship - not true?

Greetings FSFE folks!Daniel Pocock writes FSFE is censoring people:https://danielpocock.com/what-is-the-difference-between-moderation-and-censorship Please tell us this is not to be true? Virgil ___

Re: FSFE and censorship - not true?

Hi, Thank you for subscribing to this list today and joining the discussion! Regarding your question, as one of the moderators, I can tell you that the claims in the linked blog post are not true. The author either did not receive the full emails or is leaving out important parts himself. Eithe

Re: FSFE and censorship - not true?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello Virgil. I have read the news about a stated censorship that is ongoing in the mailing list. I would not be surprised if it were true that this is an ongoing action however that is impliciting that an action is to be taken by the responsible mo

Re: Talos II (FSF RYF candidate)

On Tuesday 12. September 2017 16.07.12 Timothy Pearson wrote: > Just wanted to pass this along from the FSF on this side of the pond in > case you haven't seen it yet: > > https://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/support-the-talos-ii-a-candidate-for-respects-your-freedom-certification-by-pre-ordering-b

Re: FSFE and censorship - not true?

Hi Andreas, On 14.09.2018 17:18, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > I have read the news about a stated censorship that is ongoing in the > mailing list. I would not be surprised if it were true that this is an > ongoing action however that is impliciting that an action is to be > taken by the responsible m

Re: Talos II (FSF RYF candidate)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 09/14/2018 04:02 PM, Paul Boddie wrote: > On Tuesday 12. September 2017 16.07.12 Timothy Pearson wrote: >> Just wanted to pass this along from the FSF on this side of the pond in >> case you haven't seen it yet: >> >> https://www.fsf.org/blogs/lic