Hi Paul,
Am Dienstag 28 August 2018 16:28:44 schrieb Paul Boddie:
> I do recognise the
> effort made by both staff and volunteers within the FSFE, but I do also
> recognise the frustration some people have that their involvement with the
> organisation is largely confined to paying their membershi
Hi Alessandro,I do share your concerns. Hosting your projects is just half the problem.The bigger problem in my view is that a large number of projects don't have an alternate way of accepting contributions, just GitHub PRs which force you to create a GitHub account.I think it is worth convincing p
Hi,
Am Dienstag 28 August 2018 17:32:20 schrieb Michael Kesper:
> Real membership was invite-only and restricted to about a dozen people.
> Nowadays everyone can apply for it.
note that Michael writes about the formal membership of the e.V. which is a
legal backbone of the FSFE (but not identica
Hi Daniel,
[while I am quoting from this mail which I understand you have intended
to be public, I only quote and respond on the points I believe the public
can understand. My aim is to protect you, me and others from
writing something in anger that afterwards cannot be retracted from
public
Am Mittwoch 29 August 2018 09:22:57 schrieb Ion Savin:
> I don't see why UI tools wouldn't make this process as friendly as
> GitLab/GitHub MR/PRs but I don't think they exist yet.
Have you checked out what latest Versions of Allura, Phabricator and gerrit
and do to solve this use case?
(I am se
On 29/08/18 09:15, Bernhard E. Reiter wrote:
>
>> If people had differences of opinion with me, there have been many
>> opportunities to discuss that with me at events but for the record, I'd
>> like to make it clear no other member ever did so.
> Unfortunately we did not meet at events, because I
Am 2018-08-29 um 11:05 schrieb Daniel Pocock:
> If you don't have time to meet people personally, it is inevitable there
> will be some misunderstandings in electronic communications, especially
> for those trying to squeeze too many things into their life.
... says the person who didn't attend an
Hi Daniel,
On 28.08.2018 09:25, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> On 27/08/18 16:02, Erik Albers wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> I like to believe that your activities and communication are with good
>> intention and you like to change things for the good. However, you should
>> keep
>> in mind that we are a or
Hi Daniel,
I'm not subscribed to this list, so I didn't see your email until it was
forwarded to me. However, as you're indirectly implicating me in your comments,
I would like the opportunity to respond in the same thread:
> With well over half of the funds now coming from the corporate sector
On 08/28/2018 10:43 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
It was attempted in a very underhanded and juvenile manner, an
administrative motion tacked onto the last page of a 9 page notice
(attached), reading "The current Fellowship representatives' membership
ends immediately after the this extraordinary G
# Erik Albers [2018-08-29 11:22 +0200]:
> 3) most important: the vast majority of the FSFE members voted for another
>motion. A motion to keep you in office for the whole 2 year-term!
>
> Everybody can read this in the offical minutes:
>
> "The current Fellowship representatives' membe
On Wednesday 29. August 2018 09.17.56 Bernhard E. Reiter wrote:
>
> Am Dienstag 28 August 2018 16:28:44 schrieb Paul Boddie:
> > I do recognise the
> > effort made by both staff and volunteers within the FSFE, but I do also
> > recognise the frustration some people have that their involvement with
Am 2018-08-29 um 18:17 schrieb Paul Boddie:
> Fellowship now apparently being regarded as a failed attempt to increase
> engagement amongst supporters, members and others.
I have no idea how you come to this statement.
The election of exactly one person per year from the pool of financial
suppor
On Wednesday 29. August 2018 18.35.52 Reinhard Müller wrote:
> Am 2018-08-29 um 18:17 schrieb Paul Boddie:
> > Fellowship now apparently being regarded as a failed attempt to increase
> > engagement amongst supporters, members and others.
>
> I have no idea how you come to this statement.
>
> The
On 29/08/2018 11:23, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
Am Mittwoch 29 August 2018 09:22:57 schrieb Ion Savin:
I don't see why UI tools wouldn't make this process as friendly as
GitLab/GitHub MR/PRs but I don't think they exist yet.
Have you checked out what latest Versions of Allura, Phabricator and gerr
On 27/08/18 12:49, Reinhard Müller wrote:
> Dear Daniel,
>
> after reading your email twice, I still can't make any sense of it,
> unless it's just a rant by intention. Especially I can read neither an
Why minimizing other people's views with such disparaging comments?
Making comments like that,
On 28/08/18 23:04, Christian Kalkhoff wrote:
>
> As I used more and more of those services to help spread the word about Free
> Software in Munich and Southern Germany, I was really encouraged and
> supported
> by those very employees to request what we/I needed. A significant part of
> this su
On 29/08/18 15:46, Max Mehl wrote:
> # Erik Albers [2018-08-29 11:22 +0200]:
>> 3) most important: the vast majority of the FSFE members voted for another
>>motion. A motion to keep you in office for the whole 2 year-term!
>>
>> Everybody can read this in the offical minutes:
>>
>> "The c
On 29/08/18 10:22, Reinhard Müller wrote:
> Am 2018-08-29 um 11:05 schrieb Daniel Pocock:
>> If you don't have time to meet people personally, it is inevitable there
>> will be some misunderstandings in electronic communications, especially
>> for those trying to squeeze too many things into their
On 28/08/18 09:01, Harald Welte wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I have been watching your rants on FSFE list and in other places for
> a significant amount of time. Like others, I do believe your intentions
> are good, but your tone and behaviour is not constructive at all.
> Actually, I think you're dama
Hi, Daniel!
Am 2018-08-29 um 22:56 schrieb Daniel Pocock:
>> Am 2018-08-27 um 13:19 schrieb Daniel Pocock:
>>> People are asking how FSFE e.V. can raise[5] almost EUR 650,000 in one
>>> year and spend barely EUR 37,000 on producing merchandise.
>>
>> I don't understand what exactly the question is
On 29/08/18 22:14, Reinhard Müller wrote:
>
> Some of the suggestions you made in your last email might be worth
> considering, did you ever consider to make them towards the people
> actually in charge of the financial reports?
Thanks for acknowledging that, that was the hope of my message and
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:12:14PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> If the abusive termination of somebody's membership by underhanded means
> doesn't deserve a firm response, what does?
Nobody argues against a *firm* response. You can be firm while still
using constructive wording/langu
Hi Alessandro,
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 11:35:21PM +0200, Alessandro Rubini wrote:
> So, besides self-hosting (unfeasible for whole-kernel repos)
A remark for non-kernel-hackers: The linux.git tree is so large that
you need a serious amount of RAM (and I/O bandwidth, and CPU) to host
git repositor
Hi Paul,
Am Mittwoch 29 August 2018 19:02:48 schrieb Paul Boddie:
> Certainly, using the construct of the Fellowship to facilitate wider
> participation in executive decision-making appears to have failed.
even this I would not unconditionally agree too.
The fellowship has help us to grow and to
Daniel,
Am Mittwoch 29 August 2018 22:57:18 schrieb Daniel Pocock:
> If you look at any of the significant resignations of CEOs or political
> leaders, it is usually the same pattern: they have done many good things
> but then they made one miscalculation and they have to go for the good
> of the
26 matches
Mail list logo
