On 09/01/2017 09:54 AM, discussion-requ...@lists.fsfe.org wrote:
> Subject:
> Re: FSFE in Outreachy?
> From:
> Carmen Bianca Bakker
> Date:
> 09/01/2017 07:52 AM
>
> To:
> discussion@lists.fsfe.org
>
>
Dear Carmen
This is my first post on this list that I have been lurking for some
time but it
Paul/
> Discouraging people from using FB for example can be restated as
> 'encouraging people to use FS'.
>> Not necessarily.
The (logical:-/) *necessity* of leaving FB to use FS wasn't a point I
was making as far as I can see, and I wouldn't be keen to pursue it
because with more and more softw
On 21/08/17 12:51, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:
> I think you mean "private software" which is only used by yorself, and
> not shared to anyone, not even co-workers. Once you share it at least
> with someone, it ought to be free/libre because it's no longer
> "private".
My understanding of 'priva
> Well, I wasn't arguing that persuading people to leave Facebook would
be a gain for Free Software. This was something you stated, perhaps
speculating on how some people might think: that in this zero-sum game,
people leaving Facebook will have to choose something else to fill the
void, and if you
On 21/08/17 14:28, Paul Boddie wrote:
> However, if Mat should fail to do so here, it would be a private
> matter between him and his daughter.
You would think so wouldn't you?
I can't help but see a horrible future for humanity under any alternate
conditions.
Adonay, I would welcome some justifi
Sorry... I think I wrote something wrong indeed (perhaps due to being
tired at the time)... my mistake.
I didn't mean you are required to share every FS you write.
Mat Witts writes:
> On 21/08/17 12:51, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:
>> I think you mean "private software" which is only used by y
Just for information: I was replying to the message which originated
this thread (the one which also has the link to the wiki page about the
campaign).
Adonay Felipe Nogueira writes:
> One thing that would be important to promote is GNU LibreJS markup
> compliance when the government, legislativ
Well, I hope Linux project decides to switch to GNU GPL 3+. Or even
better: GNU AGPL3+. :)
Also... Now I see what was the problem of threading: My own costume to
avoid duplicating stuff, I'll try to fix that. :)
Paul Boddie writes:
> On Sunday 3. September 2017 15.34.55 Adonay Felipe Nogueira w
Hi Natacha,
On Monday, 4 September 2017 10:17:16 CEST natacha wrote:
> This is my first post on this list that I have been lurking for some
Welcome to the mailing list :-)
> > I don't know if it's okay if I add my five cents (adjusted for
> > inflation), but I'm reasonably well-read on this and
On 04.09.2017 10:17, natacha wrote:
> But I am unequivocally against such programs, on the simple grounds that
> it tries to combat discrimination _through_ discrimination, which is
> about as silly to me as trying to achieve world peace through war.
To just negate discrimination makes it even str
10 matches
Mail list logo
