Re: Is it acceptable to use proprietary software (platforms) to promote software freedom?

Yes, I was replying to Mat. :) Also note that correct copyleft defense should be collaboration/community-oriented, not based on judiciary/litigation pressures ([1][2][3]). :) I wonder however... Does my message appear correctly threaded in your email client? For me, it does. [1]

Re: Is it acceptable to use proprietary software (platforms) to promote software freedom?

On Sunday 3. September 2017 15.34.55 Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote: > Yes, I was replying to Mat. :) > > Also note that correct copyleft defense should be > collaboration/community-oriented, not based on judiciary/litigation > pressures ([1][2][3]). :) Yes, this was a discussion on LWN recently. H

Re: Public Money - Public Code: Helping with the campaign

One thing that would be important to promote is GNU LibreJS markup compliance when the government, legislative, and judiciary wants some web site that has any JS in it, or require web sites not to use client-side scripting at all. ___ Discussion mailing l

Re: Public Money - Public Code: Helping with the campaign

That's an interesting quote you got there... In Brazil at least, it's currently inconstitutional to declare free/libre software as *mandatory* through *legislation* ([1][2]). Noting that, at least in Brazil, the major sector in legislation is the legislative, but the administrative and the judicia