On Sat, 26 Aug 2017 21:28:20 +0200
Jonas Oberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I would look at reformulating "commercial utilization" as what it is:
> > vendor-locking and anti-competitive behavior.
>
> That sounds like taking it too far. Do you mean that commercial utilization
> of free software, and of GP
Dear Hellekin,
i support your proposal to Open Sorce Technology, the condition for a
real technical development. And your strong answer to Moritz.
Moritz is a german boy. And in Germany all governments groups on any
level look for money flow. This is the base for the big corruption in
Germa
On Sun, 27 Aug 2017 14:52:03 -0400
willi uebelherr wrote:
>
> Dear Hellekin,
>
> i support your proposal to Open Sorce Technology, the condition for a
> real technical development. And your strong answer to Moritz.
>
I'm sure Moritz chose the quote I replied to on purpose, and I have
no doub
I'm not from Europe, and I'm not living there, but I would like to
mention the "misuse" of public money in Brazil.
In the country's governance level. The application used to fill and send
personal income taxes is non-free. The IRPF-Livre project from FSFLA's
Software Imposto campaign/group once ma
Hi Hellekin,
> I'm referring to 'commercial utilization' as used in the context of
> what Moritz quoted.
Thank you. I think the context is a bit muddled as it somehow seems to
suggest the GPL is unsuitable for commercial utilization. There are
certainly differences in what stance countries take o
Hi!
> I'm not from Europe, and I'm not living there, but I would like to
> mention the "misuse" of public money in Brazil.
Thank you very much, this is very helpful and useful! And I should take
the opportunity to say we're happy to see the contribution from other
countries well outside of Europe
