> [...] let's consider the advantages of negative campaigning:
> + it increases the reach of a message (due to its emotional nature)
Or not. In Europe we are "shocked", "outraged", "indignados" every
day. We've got enough of that. Negative messages have no effect at
all, in my opinion. Then we, (
I guess that everybody has a different idea of what "negative
campaigning" may be.
I like how Daniel tried to frame the discussion below.
Il giorno gio 27 lug 2017 alle 9:17, Daniel Pocock
ha scritto:
On 27/07/17 00:36, Federico Bruni wrote:
It looks like your opinion is the opposite
I would like to add just that a simple consideration into the table:
negative campaign doesn't propose a solution, it may be present in the
initial message but it would most likely be lost when referring to a
friend.
Also a negative message is usually associated with a losing party.
___
Indeed, he has a point. This can be associated with a losing party by
some people.
However, since I don't know if he considers "negative campaigns" as
"those saying things without facts and references being exposed" or if
he considers "negative campaigns" as "those merely based on insults". I
woul
On Sunday 30. July 2017 12.22.04 Federico Bruni wrote:
>
> Take online privacy or security in general (against viruses and
> malware). Recent history should have taught something to the masses,
> but did they change their behaviour? Probably just a very tiny tiny
> percentage.
> When I happen to t
Thanks Johannes and Alessandro for a good explanation what negative
campaigning actually is and how it can backfire to the sender. Some
nitpicking comments from my perspective:
# Alessandro Rubini [2017-07-30 11:26 +0200]:
Negative campaigning doesn't work. You may be self-confident you are
on
Hugo Roy wrote:
I'm looking for case studies on security and free software, in
particular the differences in how the world can respond to the discovery
of important vulnerabilities/exploits on free software vs. proprietary
software.
Structurally speaking vulnerabilities in proprietary software
On 30/07/17 11:26, Alessandro Rubini wrote:
> And even if you are at a conference on the stage with your "opponent",
> by attacking you usually shows you have no arguments. It's what our
> most unsuccessful politicians do all the time.
>
Well, Brexit was all about negative and they "won". Not
