On 27/07/17 00:36, Federico Bruni wrote:
> It looks like your opinion is the opposite of Daniel's opinion.
> He's saying that we, as free software activists, should do _more_
> negative campaigning. Why? Because a positive attitude, like caring for
> the privacy of the users, may be perceived as
>I remain concerned about defining the reason we want or need these
>followers and then measuring whether that objective is being met.
>
>To give another example: Greece's government successfully mobilized
>enough of their citizens to vote against a bailout in a referendum[1],
>but then the resul
See the arguments given by Mx. Nicholson so far. :)
___
Discussion mailing list
Discussion@lists.fsfe.org
https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Sorry, mail got stuck in my drafts but I think it's not send out yet
On 07/24/2017 03:12 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> I often tell people that Skype is like a sausage, you wouldn't eat it if you
> knew what was inside.
That's a nice comparison...
Well I'm still missing an equivalent alternative w
On 07/26/2017 04:26 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Why not put the buttons in separate groups, e.g. Facebook and Google
> under a heading "CIA approved industry partners"?
maybe not all are catching the fun in your sentence ...
I often hear 'I have nothing to hide' and sure I use facebook and
WhatsApp
On 07/26/2017 12:11 PM, mray wrote:
> Also, lets not forget - individuals may talk and tweet all day long on
> facebook or twitter about FSFE activity without us having an account!
I totally agree to your arguments. It's a hard decision but at the end
of the day it is the right one in my opinion.
