Dear Kaartic,
Great find, and I agree a free license could make this a better
project. From our point of view that is.
Some developers are not aware of free software licenses at all, some
are but still choose not to adopt a free software license. That's why I
consider you sentence 'It would have b
Last week I was at the event where the winners were announced. Here the
press release about it:
https://ec.europa.eu/isa2/news/winners-sharing-and-reuse-awards-made-public_en
On our wiki page we gathered information about the shortlisted projects:
https://wiki.fsfe.org/Activities/ShortlistSharingA
On April 6, 2017 1:41:06 PM GMT+02:00, Matthias Kirschner wrote:
>Last week I was at the event where the winners were announced. Here the
>press release about it:
>https://ec.europa.eu/isa2/news/winners-sharing-and-reuse-awards-made-public_en
Thanks for the hint. I'll read it later tonight.
>3.
Hi!
I'm Kurtis with the Replicant project. To begin, I want to thank you all
for promoting Replicant [1][2][3]! I am messaging you today asking for
your assistance. Our developer, Wolfgang, has ported 3 devices to
Replicant 6.0 so far. Replicant 6.0 is based on LineageOS 13.0, which is
the success
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 09:16:00PM +, Kurtis Hanna wrote:
>
> Here's the issue, Wolfgang is in need of more devices in order to port
> them to Replicant 6.0.
>
Not on your list but I have a good condition Galaxy S5 I could send.
--
Joseph Graham, techno-philosopher and Free Software advoca
On 06/04/17 23:27, Joseph Graham wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 09:16:00PM +, Kurtis Hanna wrote:
>>
>> Here's the issue, Wolfgang is in need of more devices in order to port
>> them to Replicant 6.0.
>>
>
> Not on your list but I have a good condition Galaxy S5 I could send.
>
Would it
