Re: LWN article on Limux / WiMue and PMPC

2018-01-06 Thread Adonay Felipe Nogueira
You took my words and left me speechless. That is: I would say exactly the same thing. ;) 2017-11-30T16:22:19+0100 Paul Boddie wrote: > Well, I guess there is some additional history that isn't readily apparent > from reading my remarks and others. Personally, I don't think it is too much > to a

Re: LWN article on Limux / WiMue and PMPC

2017-11-30 Thread Paul Boddie
On Thursday 30. November 2017 13.00.52 Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote: > Reading the comments that replied to your message there make me feel > like a blind person in a shootout... Well, I guess there is some additional history that isn't readily apparent from reading my remarks and others. Persona

Re: LWN article on Limux / WiMue and PMPC

2017-11-30 Thread Adonay Felipe Nogueira
Reading the comments that replied to your message there make me feel like a blind person in a shootout... Anyways, back on the topic. I think one way out of this would be making free/libre software that follows entirely public and well document "open" standards (as some people call it, although I

Re: LWN article on Limux / WiMue and PMPC

2017-11-16 Thread Paul Boddie
On Friday 10. November 2017 15.53.26 Matthias Kirschner wrote: > As on Wednesday a committee in Munich decided to do the Windows Munich > Migration Project (let's call that "WiMue" for short in future ;) ) I > thought you might be interested in this LWN article about my talk on the > migration in M

Re: LWN article on Limux / WiMue and PMPC

2017-11-13 Thread Matthias Kirschner
Hello Werner, * Werner Koch [2017-11-10 21:36 +0100]: publishing a private subscriber only URL to a _public_ mailing list is not for what LWN generate them as a favor to their subscribers. That is what I thought before, too. In the past I always had a reminder a week later and then distribute

Re: LWN article on Limux / WiMue and PMPC

2017-11-11 Thread David Gerard
Every time someone says something like that on Hacker News, Jonathan Corbet usually weighs in to say "actually, they're fine, please spread them." He sees them as marketing for LWN, which is why he puts them out there in the first place. On 10 November 2017 at 20:36, Werner Koch wrote: > Matze, >

Re: LWN article on Limux / WiMue and PMPC

2017-11-11 Thread Michael Kesper
Am 10. November 2017 21:36:22 MEZ schrieb Werner Koch : >Matze, > >publishing a private subscriber only URL to a _public_ mailing list is >not for what LWN generate them as a favor to their subscribers. It's common practice on hackernews for example. LWN now shows a 'please subscribe' header if yo

Re: LWN article on Limux / WiMue and PMPC

2017-11-11 Thread Max Mehl
Hi Werner, # Werner Koch [2017-11-10 21:36 +0100]: publishing a private subscriber only URL to a _public_ mailing list is not for what LWN generate them as a favor to their subscribers. When I asked Jake, author of this piece, about an article he wrote about one of my talks, he said that shari

Re: LWN article on Limux / WiMue and PMPC

2017-11-10 Thread Werner Koch
Matze, publishing a private subscriber only URL to a _public_ mailing list is not for what LWN generate them as a favor to their subscribers. Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. pgpWgfuDP8iYq.pgp Description: PGP signature _

LWN article on Limux / WiMue and PMPC

2017-11-10 Thread Matthias Kirschner
As on Wednesday a committee in Munich decided to do the Windows Munich Migration Project (let's call that "WiMue" for short in future ;) ) I thought you might be interested in this LWN article about my talk on the migration in Munich, which I gave at the Open Source Summit in Prague. https://l