Lotta people use Gitlab precisely because you can self-host a Gitlab
instance - but you can use them as a service provider it's easy to
leave.
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 at 22:47, Duncan wrote:
>
> With remote git repository hosting we have many options.
>
> You could self-host gogs or gitlab, or use man
The problem with Facebook is that it's the worst bar in town and the
bouncers are horrible, but it's also the only one where you can find
everyone.
So the question is its tactical usefulness for outreach versus its awfulness.
On 23 March 2018 at 09:20, Jonke Suhr wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> irregardle
Every time someone says something like that on Hacker News, Jonathan
Corbet usually weighs in to say "actually, they're fine, please spread
them." He sees them as marketing for LWN, which is why he puts them
out there in the first place.
On 10 November 2017 at 20:36, Werner Koch wrote:
> Matze,
>
On 2 March 2017 at 00:20, David Gerard wrote:
> Hacker News wasn't impressed either, fwiw. Here's someone who says
> they're an actual lawyer:
WRONG LINK! Try this one: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13768188
___
Di
On 1 March 2017 at 23:20, David Gerard wrote:
> On 1 March 2017 at 22:21, Moritz Bartl wrote:
>
>> Opinions? My initial gut feeling is "I don't believe this is true", but
>> I haven't had the time to go through it and review properly.
>
>
> I
On 1 March 2017 at 22:21, Moritz Bartl wrote:
> Opinions? My initial gut feeling is "I don't believe this is true", but
> I haven't had the time to go through it and review properly.
I would like to hear from an actual lawyer on the subject before panicking.
(If there are substantial legal pro
On 19 December 2016 at 21:50, David Gerard wrote:
> design remains a current topic today, e.g. https://neveragain.tech - I
ah, that doesn't work (SSL certs on github pages problem) - try
http://neveragain.tech
tl;dr you probably won't get ethics out of tech any tim
On 19 December 2016 at 21:12, Charles Cossé wrote:
> But it's been interesting to debate this ethics business, and I do prefer
> your personal position in the last paragraph of your previous post, which
> sounds much less rigid and more inclusive. And I'm essentially asking
> whether it would
On 3 November 2016 at 14:19, Erik Albers wrote:
> Are you in favor or against having a general Code of Conduct?
Yes.
> Are you in favor or against having this Code of Conduct?
Yes.
- d.
___
Discussion mailing list
Discussion@lists.f
On 3 November 2016 at 17:15, André Ockers wrote:
> 2.The alternatives are way more effective, as they keep everybody in
> a free mindset and nobody has to police over their Fellows:
> a)encourage people to strengthen themselves to be assertive,
> so they feel strong enough to say
On 3 November 2016 at 16:15, Mauricio Nascimento wrote:
> safe. Having a clear CoC will hopefully reduce the probability of any
>> unpleasant behaviour and it will also tell victims that they will be
>> looked after: we are prepared to eliminate perpetrators from our
>> community, and where appro
The unfortunate fact is that this constitutes magical thinking that does
not work out in practice.
Also, these days the lack of a CoC actively repels people. They wonder
what's wrong with an organisation not to have one, and not have it be a
good one.
On 3 November 2016 at 14:31, Mauricio Nascime
12 matches
Mail list logo
