On 16/01/18 16:29, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:
> I don't know if packaging the JS into Debian would be enough. If I
> recall correctly, Discourse depends on client-side JS, so the issues are
> more immediate in the client-side where the client is the one more
> vulnerable.
>
> There are other
I don't know if packaging the JS into Debian would be enough. If I
recall correctly, Discourse depends on client-side JS, so the issues are
more immediate in the client-side where the client is the one more
vulnerable.
There are other things that I didn't have time nor knowledge to check
yet, like
Did you really Cc them? Unless I'm somewhat blind (which is probably
true because I already wear glasses to view things better all the time),
I couldn't find them in the Cc field of your previous message.
2018-01-16T13:57:11+0100 Max Mehl wrote:
> I want to highlight that some volunteers are alrea
# Daniel Pocock [2018-01-16 13:43 +0100]:
Discourse is somewhat overwork as we would have to patch various parts
of it to either remove JS or free/libreate it.
Would packaging the Discourse JavaScript into Debian satisfy those concerns?
Is there enough interest in this topic to start building
On 15/01/18 20:45, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:
> What about upgrading to new Mailman version?
>
> If I recall correctly, it has forum-like functions and keeps the mailing
> list functions too.
>
> Discourse is somewhat overwork as we would have to patch various parts
> of it to either remove
