Re: Is it acceptable to use proprietary software (platforms) to promote software freedom?

On 22/06/17 20:51, Mirko Boehm - FSFE wrote: > Hi everybody! > >> On 21. Jun 2017, at 17:20, Federico Bruni > > wrote: >> >> Il giorno mer 21 giu 2017 alle 16:47, Daniel Pocock > > ha scritto: >>> - systems like facebook are made by the establ

Re: Is it acceptable to use proprietary software (platforms) to promote software freedom?

(I'm just a member of this list, not a member of the FSFE, which goals I strongly support though.) Erik Albers writes: > In our European core team we are having a lively discussion now about the pros > and cons of using proprietary software platforms like Facebook, Meetup, > Twitter and alike to

Re: Is it acceptable to use proprietary software (platforms) to promote software freedom?

Hi everybody! > On 21. Jun 2017, at 17:20, Federico Bruni wrote: > > Il giorno mer 21 giu 2017 alle 16:47, Daniel Pocock > ha scritto: >> - systems like facebook are made by the establishment, for the >> establishment. Zuckerberg is a regular at Bilderberg these days.

Re: Is it acceptable to use proprietary software (platforms) to promote software freedom?

Erik Albers wrote: > Maybe you noted in the Newsletter May [1] a pro and contra between our > Executive Director and our Fellowship representative: > > On the FSFE's Planet, we had an interesting dialogue popping up > between our executive director Jonas Öberg who argues that sometim