Hi,
my guess would be that the file source and UDP sink are much faster than
the UDP source and QT GUI Sink. As UDP is "fire and forget", the
"transmitter" may be pushing more data over the network than the QT GUI
Sink can handle.
To test this, you can replace the QT GUI Sink with a NULL sink,
Exactly this. By choosing UDP, you chose to drop packets when they are not
handled in time.
So, this is working 100% as expected.
Best regards,
Marcus
On 04.07.23 09:20, Fabian Schwartau wrote:
Hi,
my guess would be that the file source and UDP sink are much faster than the UDP source
and QT
Hi stackprogrammer,
pick one, and do a bit more research!
The technologies involved are pretty different. Then research based on that! "RFID" is a
wide topic, and as you can imagine, getting data out of an animal identification chip with
a reader held onto the chip works differently than readin