Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] A Humble Request....for allowing to copy Circuit into PCB

2011-01-09 Thread ikjtel
> What you seem to not realize or understand is that the > GNU Radio software that you can compile and putz around > with is worth significantly more to you than any piece of > hardware that will capture or create EM radiation. Brian is 100% correct. Could I make just a small attempt to amplify i

[Discuss-gnuradio] Try a PCR100 or PCR1000 ?

2011-01-09 Thread William Pretty Security Inc
Just a thought Marten; Why don't you get a hold of a PCR100 or PCR1000 (ICOM) I found this one on EBay, but if you surf around a bit you can probably find a cheaper one for sale on Ham Sites. http://cgi.ebay.ca/ICOM-PCR-100-ACTUAL-RADIO-UNIT-/200558103112?pt=LH_Defaul tDomain_0

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: A Humble Request.... - "Open-Hardware"

2011-01-09 Thread Moeller
On 09.01.2011 05:48, Brian Padalino wrote: >> Hello Mr. Ettus, >> Do you have any plan to reduce price for USRP1 or release PCB layout for >> poor students? > So lets figure out something that is worth while for you to do - > simulate something. Simulate anything! There is a channel simulator > b

[Discuss-gnuradio] questions about sdcc when configuring gnuradio

2011-01-09 Thread Jie Liu
Now I tried to install gnuradio on a Ubuntu 8.10 machine, with intrepid apt-source. I installed sdcc from the source and I met the configuration problems like below: checking forsdcc...sdcc -mmcs51 --no-xinit-opt checking for asx8051... no USRP requiressdcc.sdcc not found. Seehttp://sdcc.sf.net

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: A Humble Request.... - "Open-Hardware"

2011-01-09 Thread J.D. Bakker
At 18:07 +0100 09-01-2011, Moeller wrote: On 09.01.2011 05:48, Brian Padalino wrote: > competent, I doubt this line of questioning will be any better than interrogating a brick wall. It's not a wrong question to ask for cheaper hardware that everybody can afford. It is if you're not willing

[Discuss-gnuradio] Re: using rsh from a remote host

2011-01-09 Thread Patrick Strasser
schrieb Sangho Oh am 2011-01-09 06:39: > Hello, > > If I use rsh from a remote host Is there any reason not to use ssh? It is well known and secure. Patrick -- Engineers motto: cheap, good, fast: choose any two Patrick Strasser Student of Telemati_cs_, Techn. University Graz, Austria ___

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: A Humble Request.... - "Open-Hardware"

2011-01-09 Thread Moeller
On 09.01.2011 18:31, J.D. Bakker wrote: >> It's not a wrong question to ask for cheaper hardware that everybody can >> afford. > It is if you're not willing to invest the time and money to make it happen. That is the commercial point of view. GNU itself is very non-commercial. It would be logical

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: A Humble Request.... - "Open-Hardware"

2011-01-09 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 01/09/2011 04:19 PM, Moeller wrote: There are still radio amateurs, hobbyists and other people who like to share knowledge about creating hardware. See the SSRP (http://oscar.dcarr.org/ssrp/) project. You don't have to be a millionaire to finance your electronics hobby. Wasn't it just $30 fo

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: using rsh from a remote host

2011-01-09 Thread Sangho Oh
Actually, same result for ssh and rsh. I have log in and run the script. Otherwise, (if I run the scrip from remote host) gnuradio transmission does not work. - Sangho On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Patrick Strasser wrote: > schrieb Sangho Oh am 2011-01-09 06:39: > > Hello, > > > > If I use r

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: A Humble Request.... - "Open-Hardware"

2011-01-09 Thread Moeller
On 09.01.2011 22:34, Marcus D. Leech wrote: > > Sounds like you're volunteering to create such a project. Let us know when > you have everything set-up, > including initial high-level designs, and preliminary parts selections. :-) No, but some people started (SSRP), really a good starting poin

[Discuss-gnuradio] Re: using rsh from a remote host

2011-01-09 Thread Patrick Strasser
schrieb Sangho Oh on 2011-01-09 23:30: > Actually, same result for ssh and rsh. > I have log in and run the script. > Otherwise, (if I run the scrip from remote host) > gnuradio transmission does not work. Ok. Can you explain a little bit more detailed what you want to do, what you did exactly,

[Discuss-gnuradio] Re: Building gr-uhd: .Tpo file not found/Permission denied

2011-01-09 Thread Patrick Strasser
schrieb Josh Blum on 2011-01-09 04:29: > Its nothing special, you probably just did sudo make command and got > something with root permission. Make sure that your user has permission > on all the files, worst case scenario, git clean and rebuild. You are right, thanks. For some strange reason gr

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: A Humble Request.... - "Open-Hardware"

2011-01-09 Thread J.D. Bakker
[Moeller, please include some blank lines in the inline replies, as without those your mails are much harder to read] At 00:11 +0100 10-01-2011, Moeller wrote: On 09.01.2011 22:34, Marcus D. Leech wrote: > Sounds like you're volunteering to create such a project. Let us know when > you have

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: A Humble Request.... - "Open-Hardware"

2011-01-09 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 01/09/2011 06:44 PM, J.D. Bakker wrote: The SSRP doesn't look too bad. Another option is the OpenHPSDR (http://openhpsdr.org/); I believe people are working on GNUradio drivers. Actually, I'd forgotten about OpenHPSDR. Would make a passable option indeed. When I designed the LART (a

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: Building gr-uhd: .Tpo file not found/Permission denied

2011-01-09 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 01/09/2011 06:39 PM, Patrick Strasser wrote: You are right, thanks. For some strange reason gr-uhd/lib/.deps was owned by root:root. I think I ran sudo make install when the tree was not built. This triggered a regular build, wich started with 'make dep', wich generated root wowned .dep-dire

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: A Humble Request.... - "Open-Hardware"

2011-01-09 Thread Moeller
On 10.01.2011 00:44, J.D. Bakker wrote: > The SSRP doesn't look too bad. Another option is the OpenHPSDR > (http://openhpsdr.org/); I believe people are working on GNUradio drivers. I like the idea. But this one is even more complex (more expensive?) than the USRP. I believe that it's necessary f

[Discuss-gnuradio] Problem of Daughterboard XCVR 2450

2011-01-09 Thread Guanbo Zheng
Hi, I am using XCVR 2450 + USRP2 (Rev 4.0). Before they works fine. However, I just found out one of them can not set frequency recently :( The problem statement is as follows: gbzh...@gbzheng-desktop:~/downloads/ofdm_example$ sudo python benchmark_ofdm_tx_new.py --mac-addr=00:50:c2:85:3a:ff -f

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: A Humble Request.... - "Open-Hardware"

2011-01-09 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 01/09/2011 07:43 PM, Moeller wrote: But a simple one like SSRP is not that complex. You're mixing two different worlds. Complex SDR have a real CPU and bigger FPGA like the Virtex 4 or 5 for real signal processing. This cannot be done in a small Spartan chip (only DDC, not much more) SSRP do

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] questions about sdcc when configuring gnuradio

2011-01-09 Thread Peter F Bradshaw
Hi Jie; Configure is finding sdcc but it (i.e. sdcc) is reporting that it cannot compile for the 8051 by failing to compile some test code. In Debian (and, I believe, Ubuntu) there are two editions of sdcc - "free" (GNU license) and "non free". The free edition does not support the MCS51 ABI. I t