Re: UHD and USRP1

2020-02-17 Thread Michael Margaras
Hello Marcus, Hello Geof, Thanks a lot for your replies ! Indeed tried it on a Ubuntu 19.10 and everything looks fine there with latest UHDs. Benchmark_rate does not report any dropped samples even at 8 MSPS . On W10, indeed I also got very nice audio results (no clicks, interruptions etc) w

Re: UHD and USRP1

2020-02-16 Thread Geof Nieboer
Michael, I still have my USRP1, and ran the same test w/ 3.14 and got the same results on Win10, dropped packets down to the minimum supported rate. Same test, same driver against the B200 works fine up to about 20MSps which appears to be my USB 3 chip's limit. For kicks I downloaded the same old

Re: UHD and USRP1

2020-02-16 Thread Marcus Müller
Hi Michael, GR 3.3?! Wow, that *is* retro :) > Now I wanted to give it a try on W10 and a modern PC, but when I run a RX benchmark_rate test with latest UHD 3.15 but also 3.10 the command window gets filled up with DD messages and number of dropped samples is huge. That shouldn't happen. Th

UHD and USRP1

2020-02-15 Thread Michael Margaras
Hello All, I have been using my USRP1 mainly on an older Linux PC with GNU radio 3.3 . Now I wanted to give it a try on W10 and a modern PC, but when I run a RX benchmark_rate test with latest UHD 3.15 but also 3.10 the command window gets filled up with DD messages and number of dropped sam

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Quick question on UHD and USRP1

2011-05-20 Thread Josh Blum
On 05/20/2011 03:28 PM, Colby Boyer wrote: > Hey Guys, > > It seems that the USRP1 out with UHD is normalized to 1.0, vs some big > number as with the old USRP drivers. I assume this is correct? > Otherwise my cards are not kicking out any RF power. > Yup, float values are 1.0 to -1.0 -josh >

[Discuss-gnuradio] Quick question on UHD and USRP1

2011-05-20 Thread Colby Boyer
Hey Guys, It seems that the USRP1 out with UHD is normalized to 1.0, vs some big number as with the old USRP drivers. I assume this is correct? Otherwise my cards are not kicking out any RF power. --Colby ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnura

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] gr-air-modes: problem with uhd and USRP1

2010-12-01 Thread madengr
to add it. I believe the UHD documentation says if no address is specified then it uses udp to find the USRP2, however if a firewall is running (as is my case), then it will never find it and err out. http://www.ettus.com/uhd_docs/manual/html/identification.html#identifying-usrps -- View this m

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] gr-air-modes: problem with uhd and USRP1

2010-12-01 Thread Allen Vinegar
e: [Discuss-gnuradio] gr-air-modes: problem with uhd and USRP1 On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 13:55 -0500, Allen Vinegar wrote: I am getting output like the following: (-35) Type 11 (all call reply) from ac85cc in reply to interrogator 4 (-34) Type 11 (all call reply) from ac85cc in reply to interroga

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] gr-air-modes: problem with uhd and USRP1

2010-12-01 Thread Nick Foster
ically" and set the timeout to 4 or 5 seconds. --n > > > Any ideas on how to fix? > > > > Thank you, > > Al Vinegar > > > > > > - Original Message - > From: "madengr" > To: > Sent: Monday, November 29

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] gr-air-modes: problem with uhd and USRP1

2010-12-01 Thread Nick Foster
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 20:16 -0800, madengr wrote: > Nick, > > Got it working on my USRP2 by changing to line 57 to: > self.u = uhd.single_usrp_source("addr=192.168.1.15", > uhd.io_type_t.COMPLEX_FLOAT32) > > and line 119 to: > result = self.u.set_center_freq(freq,0) That's correct. The Github re

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] gr-air-modes: problem with uhd and USRP1

2010-12-01 Thread Josh Blum
> and line 119 to: > result = self.u.set_center_freq(freq,0) > I intended the channel parameters to default to 0 for the single usrp* blocks. It looks like i missed that. Will fix, thanks. -Josh ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.o

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] gr-air-modes: problem with uhd and USRP1

2010-12-01 Thread madengr
(-40) Type 11 (all call reply) from e9fc9f in reply to interrogator 5 (-41) Type 11 (all call reply) from 2c4e09 in reply to interrogator 0 I assume these are Mode-S packets, thus no position info? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/gr-air-modes%3A-problem-wit

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] gr-air-modes: problem with uhd and USRP1

2010-11-28 Thread Nick Foster
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 17:25 -0500, Josh Blum wrote: > Those were deprecated interfaces for several months. They were just > removed: http://osdir.com/ml/discuss-gnuradio-gnu/2010-11/msg00490.html > > The method calls should be nearly identical. Just change the > constructor. -Josh > Mea culpa, I

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] gr-air-modes: problem with uhd and USRP1

2010-11-28 Thread Josh Blum
Those were deprecated interfaces for several months. They were just removed: http://osdir.com/ml/discuss-gnuradio-gnu/2010-11/msg00490.html The method calls should be nearly identical. Just change the constructor. -Josh On 11/28/2010 04:54 PM, Alexander List wrote: > Hi, > > maybe the API has ch

[Discuss-gnuradio] gr-air-modes: problem with uhd and USRP1

2010-11-28 Thread Alexander List
Hi, maybe the API has changed since gr-air-modes was written, or I'm doing something stupid, but I tried: $ ./uhd_modes.py -g 60 linux; GNU C++ version 4.4.5; Boost_104200; UHD_0001.20101124180824.2568efd Traceback (most recent call last): File "./uhd_modes.py", line 167, in fg = adsb_rx_