Johannes,
Thanks for your reply!
Occasionally, I encounter difficulties in retrieving the data when I send a
text file and attempt to read it using the message debug feature on the
receiving end.
Regards,HZ
On Monday, May 15, 2023 at 05:30:59 AM CDT, Johannes Demel
wrote:
Hi Hamed
Hi Hamed,
you mentioned that increasing the TX and RX gain reduced the number of
invalid packets. Still, as long as you transmit over an imperfect
channel, there will be reception errors.
The reports you receive stem from the logging system. They are tagged
":info:" because this might be an
Ed,
I tried the NLOS scenario to avoid distortion, but still the same error occurs.
Thanks!HZ On Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 11:07:22 AM CDT, Ed Criscuolo
wrote:
2 meters seems like an incredibly short distance unless you have an attenuator
in series with the Tx antenna. You may be ov
2 meters seems like an incredibly short distance unless you have an attenuator
in series with the Tx antenna. You may be overdriving the receiver and causing
distortion errors.
@(^.^)@ Ed
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 12, 2023, at 8:10 PM, Hamed Al-Zubi wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I am utiliz
Hi Marcus,
I am using GPSDO as a reference clock.
I also increased the UHD gain of both TX and RX. The number of invalid packets
was reduced, but still there is some invalid packets.
Thanks, HZOn Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 04:36:10 AM CDT, Marcus Müller
wrote:
Hi Hamed,
consider
Hi Hamed,
consider noise.
Any real-world communication is subject to it.
Another thing would be sample clock offset, which you could reduce if you clock both X300
from the same reference clock, or the Clock ref out on the back of the first X300 and
connect it to the Clock ref in of the second,
