Cursory glance at `git diff v2.5.0..v2.51 **/**.h` tells me you didn't change anything
ABI-wise.
Cheers,
Marcus
On 14.02.22 13:38, Johannes Demel wrote:
Hi all,
while I did not run the ABI compliance checker to compare 2.5.0 vs 2.5.1 specifically, it
is simple and can be done with this tool:
Hi all,
while I did not run the ABI compliance checker to compare 2.5.0 vs 2.5.1
specifically, it is simple and can be done with this tool:
https://lvc.github.io/abi-compliance-checker/#ABI_Dumper
So far, we were able to keep the ABI compatible across VOLK 2.x.
Also, we didn't change any functi
Fons - filesystem is used for the volk_profile utility.
Chris - do not assume ABI compatibility. A number of small things have
changed in ".h" files.
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 6:19 PM Chris Vine wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Feb 2022 11:40:26 +0100
> Johannes Demel wrote:
> > Hi everyone!
> >
> > You can
On Sat, 12 Feb 2022 11:40:26 +0100
Johannes Demel wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> You can find the news at https://www.libvolk.org/release-v251.html as well.
>
> We have a new VOLK release! We are happy to announce VOLK v2.5.1! We
> want to thank all contributors. This release wouldn't have been poss
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 11:40:26AM +0100, Johannes Demel wrote:
> In the past, we relied on Boost for several tasks in `volk_profile`. For
> years, we minimized Boost usage to `boost::filesystem`. We mostly switched
> to C++17 `std::filesystem` years ago. The last distribution in our CI system
> t
