On 02/26/2016 07:57 AM, Mabel Pita wrote:
Also for the other answers, what i am most interested in is SDR
software. What is gnu radio place in the most cuttign edge technology
available for SDR software and how it compares to other products like
SDR# etc.
You're comparing apples and oranges,
Dear Mabel,
On 02/26/2016 01:57 PM, Mabel Pita wrote:
> What is gnu radio place in the most cuttign edge technology available
> for SDR software and how it compares to other products like SDR# etc.
You really haven't done your homework since you first asked that
question and I pointed you to ress
Cell phones in the last approx *20*+ years have been SDR based...we started
production of a dual core processor with an instruction set specifically
enhanced for SDR that ran part of the GSM radio for handsets in S/W (as
well as the voice codecs) in about 1993 when I worked at Motorola. I also
rec
I have not found the downlaod link of the submitted papers. Can you tell me
where they are? Do i have to pay to access those papers?
Also for the other answers, what i am most interested in is SDR software.
What is gnu radio place in the most cuttign edge technology available for SDR
software and
That was pretty much what I wanted to say.
"State of the art in SDR" is very *very* ambiguous; it could refer to
* SDR as a tool to make transceiver or measurement systems, and in that
both the fact that existing non-SDR systems are now SDR, or that new
systems are possible with SDR,
* SDR hardwar
Also, the question is somewhat bifurcated. There are two aspects:
(a) Which parameters in the hardware end of things have advanced, and
at what rate, and what is considered "state of the art". This gets
broken down into a few sub-categories:
o ADC/DAC speeds
o FPGA gate-counts and speed
You probably will want to look at the papers published in this call for papers:
http://www.comsoc.org/commag/cfp/software-defined-radio-20-years-later
On February 23, 2016 at 17:05:49, Mabel Pita (mabel.pita2...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
Thank you so much for your answers.
Maybe i did not express
Hi,
Thank you so much for your answers.
Maybe i did not express myself correctly in my original mail.
I am taking a course on SDRs at my university, and an assignment is to do
some research about SDRs, especially on the state of the art of SDR, by
this i mean, the most cutting edge technology that
Sorry for my ignorance, I was only talking from my personal experience.
On Feb 23, 2016 01:34, "Sylvain Munaut" <246...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I am kind of confused as to what you mean by "state of the art". I
> > personally would consider any SDR to be pretty state of the art; it has
> be
Hi,
> I am kind of confused as to what you mean by "state of the art". I
> personally would consider any SDR to be pretty state of the art; it has been
> around for some years, but it is by no means common place.
?!?
Cellphones made in the last 10+ years are all SDRs. Same thing for the
network
Mabel,
I am kind of confused as to what you mean by "state of the art". I
personally would consider any SDR to be pretty state of the art; it has
been around for some years, but it is by no means common place.
Being unfamiliar with SDRsharp, a quick google search and read through of
their websit
Hi Mabel,
SDRsharp and GNU Radio are fundamentally different. SDRsharp is a
single-purpose application for reception of a single class of signals.
GNU Radio is a framework for developing SDR and other DSP applications.
You should really read our intro to GNU Radio to get a feeling for
things [1]!
12 matches
Mail list logo
