Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Why you should be be trying out the UHD

2010-04-26 Thread Matt Ettus
On 04/26/2010 12:09 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote: On 04/26/2010 01:41 PM, Josh Blum wrote: In band signaling is a misnomer. But yes, the UHD supports time stamped samples down to the precision of the clock. The time spec uses a 32 bit integer for seconds and a double for fractional seconds (in nano

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Why you should be be trying out the UHD

2010-04-26 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 04/26/2010 01:41 PM, Josh Blum wrote: > In band signaling is a misnomer. But yes, the UHD supports time > stamped samples down to the precision of the clock. The time spec uses > a 32 bit integer for seconds and a double for fractional seconds (in > nanoseconds). The reason for using nanoseconds

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Why you should be be trying out the UHD

2010-04-26 Thread Josh Blum
In band signaling is a misnomer. But yes, the UHD supports time stamped samples down to the precision of the clock. The time spec uses a 32 bit integer for seconds and a double for fractional seconds (in nanoseconds). The reason for using nanoseconds was to make the time spec independent of the

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Why you should be be trying out the UHD

2010-04-26 Thread Sylvain Munaut
Matt Ettus wrote: > > Things are starting to stabilize on the UHD front and everything is > moving forward rapidly. You should really be trying out the UHD *now* > if any of the following applies to you: > - You want to use USRPs with software other than GNU Radio (like > OpenBTS, OSSIE, SCARI,