c
>>>
>>> offset 0 in1: 0.140486 in2: 0.140486
>>>
>>> offset 1 in1: 0.691375 in2: 0.691375
>>>
>>> offset 5 in1: 0.63745 in2: 0.63745
>>>
>>> offset 11 in1: 0.644697 in2: 0.644697****
>>>
>>> offset 14 in
5774
>>
>> volk_32fc_x2_multiply_32fc_a: fail on arch orc****
>>
>> offset 1 in1: 0.524585 in2: 0.524585
>>
>> offset 2 in1: 0.236218 in2: 0.236218
>>
>> offset 6 in1: 0.733853 in2: 0.733853
>>
>> offset 9 in1: 0.2902
t; offset 12 in1: 0.180218 in2: 0.180218
>
> offset 14 in1: 0.496568 in2: 0.496568
>
> offset 15 in1: 0.0297472 in2: 0.0297472****
>
> offset 19 in1: 0.351138 in2: 0.351138
>
> offset 20 in1: 0.300737 in2: 0.300737
>
> volk_32fc_x2_multiply_32fc_a: fail
**
>
> offset 15 in1: 0.0297472 in2: 0.0297472
>
> offset 19 in1: 0.351138 in2: 0.351138
>
> offset 20 in1: 0.300737 in2: 0.300737
>
> volk_32fc_x2_multiply_32fc_a: fail on arch orc
>
> Best arch: generic
>
> ** **
>
> Sean
Rondeau
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 11:18 AM
To: Nowlan, Sean
Cc: Nick Foster; discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Using volk in Mac: test report
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Nowlan, Sean
mailto:sean.now...@gtri.gatech.edu>> wrote:
I confirmed this works on E100 i
* trond...@trondeau.com [mailto:trond...@trondeau.com] *On Behalf
> Of *Tom Rondeau
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 21, 2012 6:49 PM
> *To:* Nick Foster
> *Cc:* Nowlan, Sean; discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Using volk in Mac: test report
>
> **
: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 6:49 PM
To: Nick Foster
Cc: Nowlan, Sean; discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Using volk in Mac: test report
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Nick Foster
mailto:n...@ettus.com>> wrote:
Tom, Sean,
There's a couple of things here. Fir
>> We'll need some other brave soul out there who can dig into these issues
>> on the platforms for us.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tom
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> *From:* trond...@trondeau.com [mailto:trond...@trondeau.com] *On Behalf
>>> Of
the platforms for us.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
>
>
>
>> *From:* trond...@trondeau.com [mailto:trond...@trondeau.com] *On Behalf
>> Of *Tom Rondeau
>> *Sent:* Friday, February 17, 2012 5:25 PM
>> *To:* Nowlan, Sean
>> *Cc:* Nick Foster; discuss-gnuradio
io-bounces+sean.nowlan=gtri.gatech@gnu.org] On Behalf
Of Nowlan, Sean
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 11:36 AM
To: Nick Foster; Tom Rondeau
Cc: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Using volk in Mac: test report
I believe I'm using 0.4.16. It's the version packaged in t
>] On Behalf Of Tom
Rondeau
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 5:25 PM
To: Nowlan, Sean
Cc: Nick Foster; discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org<mailto:discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Using volk in Mac: test report
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Nowlan, Sean
mailto:sean.now...@gtri.
to:trond...@trondeau.com] *On Behalf
>> Of *Tom Rondeau
>> *Sent:* Friday, February 17, 2012 5:25 PM
>> *To:* Nowlan, Sean
>> *Cc:* Nick Foster; discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Using volk in Mac: test report
>>
ck Foster; discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Using volk in Mac: test report
>
> ** **
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Nowlan, Sean
> wrote:
>
> I built Tom’s safe_align branch on E100 and ran volk_profile. It
> segfaulted o
h@gnu.org] *On Behalf
> Of *Tom Rondeau
> *Sent:* Friday, February 17, 2012 2:33 PM
> *To:* Nick Foster
> *Cc:* discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Using volk in Mac: test report
>
> ** **
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:30 PM,
lan=gtri.gatech@gnu.org] On Behalf
Of Tom Rondeau
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 2:33 PM
To: Nick Foster
Cc: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Using volk in Mac: test report
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Nick Foster
mailto:n...@ettus.com>> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 201
Great!
You guys are making all this stuff pretty easy to use, even for
non-experts. Thanks for letting us squeeze our processors :-)
Carles
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Nick Foster wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Carles
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Nick Foster wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Carles Fernandez <
> carles.fernan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the inputs!
>>
>> We are interested in determining the best architecture at instantation
>> time. What would be the best strategy? We tho
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Carles Fernandez <
carles.fernan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the inputs!
>
> We are interested in determining the best architecture at instantation
> time. What would be the best strategy? We though about running the
> same operations several times for each
Thanks for the inputs!
We are interested in determining the best architecture at instantation
time. What would be the best strategy? We though about running the
same operations several times for each architecture, measure the
results and use the fastest one for the processing blocks. Would this
be
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Tom Rondeau wrote:
> Carles,
>
> Thanks for the report! We'll look into those failures. Hopefully just some
> minor misundertanding.
>
> As for the generic sometimes being the best arch, I'm not sure I can help
> too much on it. I can certainly speculate. Having s
Carles,
Thanks for the report! We'll look into those failures. Hopefully just some
minor misundertanding.
As for the generic sometimes being the best arch, I'm not sure I can help
too much on it. I can certainly speculate. Having seen this in my own
machines and looked at some of the kernels wher
21 matches
Mail list logo
