Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] OFDM cyclic prefixer

2014-05-15 Thread Yuri P.M
Thank you very much, for your help Mr. Economos, For sure I will take a look at this project, Yuri. 2014-05-14 21:12 GMT-03:00 Ron Economos : > If you haven't already, you may want to take a look > at this GnuRadio DVB-T implementation. > > https://github.com/BogdanDIA/gr-dvbt > > Ron > > > On

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] OFDM cyclic prefixer

2014-05-14 Thread Ron Economos
If you haven't already, you may want to take a look at this GnuRadio DVB-T implementation. https://github.com/BogdanDIA/gr-dvbt Ron On 5/14/2014 1:50 PM, Yuri P.M wrote: Hi, Thanks Mr. Economos and Mr. Braun, I left this parameter in blank (I guess this is the same as an empty string), it s

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] OFDM cyclic prefixer

2014-05-14 Thread Yuri P.M
Hi, Thanks Mr. Economos and Mr. Braun, I left this parameter in blank (I guess this is the same as an empty string), it seems that it is working now. Actually I am trying to modulate ISDB-T data stream. I am working with vectors, instead of data stream. Thanks again. 2014-05-14 5:28 GMT-03:00

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] OFDM cyclic prefixer

2014-05-14 Thread Martin Braun
On 14.05.2014 04:36, Ron Economos wrote: If you're sending packets, then Length Tag Key should be set to the packet length you're using. If you're sending a stream (like DVB-T), then this field is not used (and left blank). It needs an empty string, in this case. The OFDM cyclic prefixer is u

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] OFDM cyclic prefixer

2014-05-13 Thread Ron Economos
If you're sending packets, then Length Tag Key should be set to the packet length you're using. If you're sending a stream (like DVB-T), then this field is not used (and left blank). The OFDM cyclic prefixer is used after the (reverse) FFT block. The FFT Length in the OFDM Cyclic Prefixer block s