Will do. I'll take a crack at it this weekend. I suppose the tricky bit
not be implementing this for source-based build and install, but for a
package-based install where source is not left behind. Maybe in that case,
the doc example/reference links can point to the public repo.
Very Respectful
It's cool! Thanks!
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Martin Braun (CEL)
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:38:40AM -0600, Alex Zhang wrote:
> > For me, I am very interested in that is there any open project to
> improve the
> > data rate and packet loss for the GNURadio based OFDM?
> >
> > Some
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:38:40AM -0600, Alex Zhang wrote:
> For me, I am very interested in that is there any open project to improve the
> data rate and packet loss for the GNURadio based OFDM?
>
> Some guys claimed that the LTE standards are implemented with USRP and PC by
> SIMD programming.
For me, I am very interested in that is there any open project to improve
the data rate and packet loss for the GNURadio based OFDM?
Some guys claimed that the LTE standards are implemented with USRP and PC
by SIMD programming. But their code are not open.
If GNURadio based OFDM can support high d
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 08:12:46PM +0100, Carles Fernandez wrote:
> I would like to ask you about the participation in GSoC 2013 of the GNSS-SDR
> project under the umbrella of GNU Radio. Last year I served as a mentor and we
> all (the student, other developers and I) had a nice experience adding
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Carles Fernandez <
carles.fernan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...but I personally feel that only GNSS-SDR took advantage from the work
> done in GSoC 2012, having no impact for the majority of GNU Radio users.
>
As we discussed at the GNU Radio conference last year, i
Hi there,
I would like to ask you about the participation in GSoC 2013 of the
GNSS-SDR project under the umbrella of GNU Radio. Last year I served as a
mentor and we all (the student, other developers and I) had a nice
experience adding Galileo capabilities to the GNSS software receiver. We
enjoye
On 02/27/2013 10:49 AM, Dan CaJacob wrote:
> Really great documentation would be nice. I know that it has been
> improving, but maybe GSOC is an excuse for a sprint? Ideally, the
> documenter is someone who really knows DSP and what is going on behind the
> curtains.
GSoC is for code related wor
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Dan CaJacob wrote:
> I have always wanted an auto-magically generated list of references to
> other blocks/examples that use the block being documented. I think this
> would be easy to do in python. When building the docs, a script could
> search for instances
Really great documentation would be nice. I know that it has been
improving, but maybe GSOC is an excuse for a sprint? Ideally, the
documenter is someone who really knows DSP and what is going on behind the
curtains.
References to examples in the documentation would help out immensely. I
often
Ideas, ideas, ideas!
Everyone, we need ideas.
The GSoC application deadline is coming closer, and we still are lacking
some ideas.
So what cool feature of GNU Radio are *you* missing?
Head over here, and write them down:
http://gnuradio.org/redmine/projects/gnuradio/wiki/GSoC
At this point, any
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:24:56AM +0100, Martin Braun (CEL) wrote:
> OK, now more detail:
>
> [stuff on GSoC]
Faculty and GSoC
One thing I'd like to add: Participants must be students, of course.
This implies that people will be doing GSoC while enrolled in some kind
of univers
12 matches
Mail list logo
