Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] C++ daughterboard code [was MATLAB...]

2008-04-21 Thread Michael Dickens
On Apr 20, 2008, at 11:25 PM, George Nychis wrote: Michael Dickens wrote: I could be talked into doing that. It would benefit my current efforts greatly. Please do send out (to the list, or me specifically) your US$0.02 worth. - MLD Are you still considering doing this? Is anyone out the

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] C++ daughterboard code [was MATLAB...]

2008-04-20 Thread George Nychis
Michael Dickens wrote: I could be talked into doing that. It would benefit my current efforts greatly. Please do send out (to the list, or me specifically) your US$0.02 worth. - MLD Michael, Are you still considering doing this? Is anyone out there interested in taking this on? I ca

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] C++ daughterboard code

2008-04-09 Thread Johnathan Corgan
Eric Blossom wrote: >> For the USRP1, then, there needs to be a method on usrp_standard_rx and >> usrp_standard_tx classes that produces one of these callback objects. > > I'm assuming that this is just a simple C++ class with virtual methods. Yes, it would derive from a the hwa virtual base cla

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] C++ daughterboard code

2008-04-09 Thread Eric Blossom
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 02:48:50PM -0700, Johnathan Corgan wrote: > > There is a developer branch: > > http://gnuradio.org/trac/browser/gnuradio/branches/developers/jcorgan/usrpdb > > This branch has implemented the framework for a C++ implementation of > all the daughterboards, and several boar

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] C++ daughterboard code [was MATLAB...]

2008-04-09 Thread Johnathan Corgan
Eric Blossom wrote: > I suggest investing the effort required to convert the daughterboard > code to C++. Johnathan has looked at this, and may still have a > developer branch around somewhere. If you're interested in working > on this, please post a note to the list, and Johnathan, Matt or I >

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] C++ daughterboard code [was MATLAB...]

2008-04-09 Thread Michael Dickens
On Apr 9, 2008, at 4:56 PM, Eric Blossom wrote: If somebody wants do do something useful that would forward the action, I suggest investing the effort required to convert the daughterboard code to C++. Johnathan has looked at this, and may still have a developer branch around somewhere. If you'