> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:12:02 +0200
> From: Marcus Müller marcus.muel...@ettus.com
>
> To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Audio sink to "wire"
> Message-
Hey Henning,
huh! Doesn't putting the same sink name into the upstream GNU Radio audio source do the
same? Asking for a friend who's collecting bugs on the gr-audio blocks [1]…
Best regards,
Marcus
[1] https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/issues/2539#issuecomment-2078130433
On 06.06.24 22:08
ller
Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2024 2:38 PM
To: Kevin McQuiggin ; discuss >> GNURadio Discussion List
; dave_a...@bigpond.com; Šerých Jakub
Subject: Re: Audio sink to "wire"
Hi everyone,
trying to get the discussion back under one email thread (hint: it's easier to
deal with
Hi everyone,
trying to get the discussion back under one email thread (hint: it's easier to deal with
the mailing list if you *don't* get the digest but each email individually, and set up
your email client or -service to file emails from the mailing list into their own folder).
So, Dave poin
Hi Jakub and Marcus:
On the Mac, use the BlackHole virtual audio driver. It’s at
https://github.com/ExistentialAudio/BlackHole. You can create a virtual audio
device and point WSJT-X at it for input, output, or both. It works well and
the developer is responsive to questions and suggestions.
Uff, please don't recommend such stunts :) This can be solved easily in
software at zero cost.
If you're on a modern Linux, you use the pipewire audio system. Install `qpwgraph`, start
WSJT-X and just use qwpgraph to connect the output of your GNU Radio flow graph to the
input of your WSJT-X.
Hi Jakub and group!
IMO the simplest way to "redirect" audio sink, and that's the solution I
usually use, use another USB sound card for WSJT-X with an "audio splitter" and
“physical crossed cable”.
The audio splitter is only necessary if you want to monitor the audio.
No need for complicated set
