Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] reg: GNU RADIO BUILD PROBLEM

2006-11-02 Thread shriram.vasudevan
>Yes. Chances are, however, that your cppunit has been compield with a>different compiler version than the one used to build gnuradio. In>such cases, linking may result in such mismatches.>I'd try compiling 1.12.0 from scratch, without using cygwin prebuilt packages.>Tomasz   Tried it too..

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] reg: GNU RADIO BUILD PROBLEM

2006-11-02 Thread Tomasz Mloduchowski
Yes. Chances are, however, that your cppunit has been compield with a different compiler version than the one used to build gnuradio. In such cases, linking may result in such mismatches. I'd try compiling 1.12.0 from scratch, without using cygwin prebuilt packages. Tomasz On 11/2/06, [EMAIL PR

RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] reg: GNU RADIO BUILD PROBLEM

2006-11-02 Thread shriram.vasudevan
Title: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] reg: GNU RADIO BUILD PROBLEM   >To me it seems like a cppunit ABI mismatch.. Try getting the most>recent source for cppunit and build it...>but, I never used cygwin, I might be wrong.>Tomasz The cpp unit i'm using is 1.12.0 (as instructed i

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] reg: GNU RADIO BUILD PROBLEM

2006-11-02 Thread Tomasz Mloduchowski
To me it seems like a cppunit ABI mismatch.. Try getting the most recent source for cppunit and build it... but, I never used cygwin, I might be wrong. Tomasz >Well, if you want to use automake-1.10.x series (which is default on >Gentoo Linux ATM) you can add the line >AM_PROG_AS >somewhere in

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] reg: GNU RADIO BUILD PROBLEM

2006-11-02 Thread shriram.vasudevan
  >Well, if you want to use automake-1.10.x series (which is default on>Gentoo Linux ATM) you can add the line>AM_PROG_AS>somewhere in the configure.ac, ./bootstrap and ./configure>Tomasz Did that Exactly that and the problem with the ./bootstrap went away and ./configure went successfully f

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] reg: GNU RADIO BUILD PROBLEM

2006-11-02 Thread Tomasz Mloduchowski
%-style pattern rules are not errors, they are just warnings, nothing to worry about (unless you use non-gnu make). AM_PROG_AS - I don't know how it does that, but it makes automake create all necessary Makefile.in files across the tree. By doing so, it's possible to run ./configure and successfu

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] reg: GNU RADIO BUILD PROBLEM

2006-11-02 Thread Don Ward
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] reg: GNU RADIO BUILD PROBLEMI get the same errors (except for those in pstoedit.m4) after updating Cygwin automake to 1.10-1 and autoconf2.5 to 2.60-1 (the "current" versions on my Cygwin mirror). I am working with a several-weeks-old svn checkout of GNU Radio. In addition

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] reg: GNU RADIO BUILD PROBLEM

2006-11-02 Thread Dan Halperin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >The first issue, with the automake version, can be addressed in the > >Cygwin setup.exe program. It should be offering you version 1.9.6. If > >it is not, the mirror you selected must be out of date. > > A cygcheck revealed the automake version as u indicated >

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] reg: GNU RADIO BUILD PROBLEM

2006-11-02 Thread shriram.vasudevan
Title: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] reg: GNU RADIO BUILD PROBLEM     >The first issue, with the automake version, can be addressed in the>Cygwin setup.exe program.  It should be offering you version 1.9.6.  If>it is not, the mirror you selected must be out of date. A cygcheck rev

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] reg: GNU RADIO BUILD PROBLEM

2006-11-02 Thread Johnathan Corgan
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 14:15 -0500, Don Ward wrote: > I think Shriram had automake vesion 1.10, which is offered as the new > "current" version on the Cygwin mirror site that I use. Unless they broke > something going to the new version, it should work. It sounds like the > version listings on th

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] reg: GNU RADIO BUILD PROBLEM

2006-11-02 Thread Don Ward
The first issue, with the automake version, can be addressed in the Cygwin setup.exe program. It should be offering you version 1.9.6. If it is not, the mirror you selected must be out of date. I think Shriram had automake vesion 1.10, which is offered as the new "current" version on the Cygwi

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] reg: GNU RADIO BUILD PROBLEM

2006-11-02 Thread Johnathan Corgan
On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 00:06 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Even I thought of the same thing and I have tried with cygwin packages > downloaded from almost four or five mirrorsFrom what you say, > the problem seems to be with cygwin package, but how do I rectify it?? > Can you be more sp

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] reg: GNU RADIO BUILD PROBLEM

2006-11-02 Thread shriram.vasudevan
>> I have tried this with both the release 3.0 and the 3.0rc3 but get the>> same message. Before I updated my cygwin package, I used the same>> source and was able to build the GNUradio code fully without errors>> (But the programs didnt work though!!).>Given the above two issues, it appears

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] reg: GNU RADIO BUILD PROBLEM

2006-11-02 Thread Johnathan Corgan
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 18:53 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > /usr/share/automake-1.10/am/depend2.am: GNU Radio requires automake 1.7.4 or later, as documented in the README in the root directory of the source tree. Cygwin's website currently lists automake 1.9.6 as the most recent available thro

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] reg: GNU RADIO BUILD PROBLEM

2006-11-02 Thread shriram.vasudevan
Title: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] reg: GNU RADIO BUILD PROBLEM > >I was not able to find makefile.in the "gnuradio/gnuradio-core/src/lib/filter" >>directory. Why is the ./configure asking for> >that file when it seems to be not included with the package??>Norma

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] reg: GNU RADIO BUILD PROBLEM

2006-11-01 Thread Johnathan Corgan
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 16:00 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I was not able to find that file. Why is the ./configure asking for > that file when it seems to be not included with the package?? Normally, that file is created when you run ./bootstrap, so it's not a file that would be included when

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] reg: GNU RADIO BUILD PROBLEM

2006-11-01 Thread Kyle Zhou
Sorry to hear that u still have problems building gnuradio. This link might be useful. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2006-10/msg00378.html Cheers Kyle Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:00:12 +0530 From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subjec