Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: WBX and serial < 500

2010-02-05 Thread mike
Hi Rafael, Have a look at http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/eb/USRP1.jpg This is what a rev3 board looks like. Cheers, Mike M0MIK On 5 February 2010 21:15, Rafael Diniz wrote: > How can I check the serial of my usrp? > I just bought a RFX900 and I'd to know if it will work with

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: WBX and serial < 500

2010-02-05 Thread Rafael Diniz
How can I check the serial of my usrp? I just bought a RFX900 and I'd to know if it will work with my usrp. Thanks, Rafael Diniz > >> I just read on the mailing list that you state that the WBX does not >> work with USRPs of serials older than #500. Is there some >> fix/workaround available? > >

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: WBX

2010-01-15 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 01/15/2010 12:39 PM, Matt Ettus wrote: Yes, that one is actually designed by the same person as the one we sell. We could carry it as well if there were enough demand. Matt Something I wonder about FR4-based patch antennae is the loss factor. At the higher frequencies (above 500Mhz

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: WBX

2010-01-15 Thread Matt Ettus
On 01/15/2010 07:32 AM, John Ewan wrote: Another antenna to look at. http://www.ramseyelectronics.com/cgi-bin/commerce.exe?preadd=action&key=LPY41 Yes, that one is actually designed by the same person as the one we sell. We could carry it as well if there were enough demand. Matt _

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: WBX

2010-01-15 Thread Mark Whittington
on&key=LPY41 > > > > > > From: > discuss-gnuradio-bounces+jewan=its.bldrdoc@gnu.org[discuss-gnuradio-bounces+jewan= > its.bldrdoc@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Marcus D. Leech [mle...@ripnet.com] > Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 12:10 AM > To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu

RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: WBX

2010-01-15 Thread John Ewan
us D. Leech [mle...@ripnet.com] Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 12:10 AM To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: WBX On 01/15/2010 12:26 AM, Matt Ettus wrote: > > The Vert400 antenna will work well over several separate bands: > > 118-160MHz, 250-290MHz, > 360-390M

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: WBX

2010-01-14 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 01/15/2010 12:26 AM, Matt Ettus wrote: The Vert400 antenna will work well over several separate bands: 118-160MHz, 250-290MHz, 360-390MHz, 420-470MHz, 820-960MHz, 1260-1300MHz It will radiate but will not be optimal in areas outside of that. For this wide a bandwidth you could also look i

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: WBX

2010-01-14 Thread Matt Ettus
On 01/14/2010 02:52 PM, Veljko Pejovic wrote: Hi Matt, Is there an approximate release date for USRP2 driver? Also, which type of antenna do you suggest for the WBX. Also, the Vert900 will cover 800-1000 MHz and 1600-2000 MHz very well. Matt __

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: WBX

2010-01-14 Thread Matt Ettus
The Vert400 antenna will work well over several separate bands: 118-160MHz, 250-290MHz, 360-390MHz, 420-470MHz, 820-960MHz, 1260-1300MHz It will radiate but will not be optimal in areas outside of that. For this wide a bandwidth you could also look into a discone antenna. Radio shack and so

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: WBX

2010-01-14 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 01/14/2010 05:52 PM, Veljko Pejovic wrote: Hi Matt, Is there an approximate release date for USRP2 driver? Also, which type of antenna do you suggest for the WBX. Thanks, Veljko Really, if you're going to be using the full range of the WBX, you should probably use something like

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: WBX

2010-01-14 Thread Veljko Pejovic
Hi Matt, Is there an approximate release date for USRP2 driver? Also, which type of antenna do you suggest for the WBX. Thanks, Veljko 2010/1/13 Matt Ettus : > On 01/13/2010 12:01 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Matt Ettus  wrote: >>> >>> At long last, the