Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NBFM modulation block

2013-01-09 Thread Marcus D. Leech
I want to know what internally does NBFMmodulationblock, How I can build that function with separated blocks?? ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio You could look at the so

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NBFM

2005-02-22 Thread James Cooley
I'm having a bit of trouble getting this one to work... I'm running the input through a microtune 4937 frontend, so that the IF is 5.75e6. I've changed Matt's nbfm script just to adjust this IF_freq. Is there anything else that needs to be done? I'm trying to tune to a known station, the weather

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NBFM

2005-02-18 Thread Eric Blossom
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 05:42:03AM -, Robert McGwier wrote: > In a really good NBFM receiver, where you are attempting to use it > for voice communications, and hand helds are involved (say), it is > important to have threshold effect improvement. This will improve > intelligibility on import

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NBFM

2005-02-17 Thread Al Davis
On Thursday 17 February 2005 07:32 pm, Marcus D. Leech wrote: > In the analog world, do they implement squelch using >   detected RF power levels (i.e. prior to FM demod), or >   something else? It is usually done by measuring detected noise. Recall, in FM, audio output level is independent of t

RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] NBFM

2005-02-17 Thread Robert McGwier
In a really good NBFM receiver, where you are attempting to use it for voice communications, and hand helds are involved (say), it is important to have threshold effect improvement. This will improve intelligibility on important links such as official/government communications. This is done by u

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NBFM

2005-02-17 Thread Chuck Swiger
At 11:54 AM 2/17/2005 -0800, you wrote: I realized about an hour before a demo last night that we didn't have narrowband FM (like ham and public safety), so I coded it up. Its in the gnuradio-examples package, and it is commented rather liberally. It will require an update on the gr-wxgui stuff

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NBFM

2005-02-17 Thread Marcus D. Leech
Johnathan Corgan wrote: > > Marcus D. Leech wrote: > > > I'm jealous that I wasn't there (wherever *there* was :-) ). > > This was a USRP demonstration at the West Valley Amateur Radio > Association in San Jose, CA. Excellent job by Matt...I think you will > get a few orders, too. > > -Johnath

RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] NBFM

2005-02-17 Thread Matthew Francey
Marcus Leech asked: >In the analog world, do they implement squelch using > detected RF power levels (i.e. prior to FM demod), or > something else? I think early receivers used an AGC level. Modern receivers use the noise: once the high frequency (above the expected voice bandwidth) content

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NBFM

2005-02-17 Thread Marcus D. Leech
Johnathan Corgan wrote: > > Matt Ettus wrote: > > > I realized about an hour before a demo last night that we didn't have > > narrowband > > FM (like ham and public safety), so I coded it up. Its in the > > gnuradio-examples package, and it is commented rather liberally. > > As an attendee at

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NBFM

2005-02-17 Thread Johnathan Corgan
Marcus D. Leech wrote: I'm jealous that I wasn't there (wherever *there* was :-) ). This was a USRP demonstration at the West Valley Amateur Radio Association in San Jose, CA. Excellent job by Matt...I think you will get a few orders, too. -Johnathan, AE6HO _

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NBFM

2005-02-17 Thread Johnathan Corgan
Matt Ettus wrote: I realized about an hour before a demo last night that we didn't have narrowband FM (like ham and public safety), so I coded it up. Its in the gnuradio-examples package, and it is commented rather liberally. As an attendee at the demo last night, this was a pretty slick way of s