On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 06:14, LRK wrote:
> Here run as user gr:
>
> ./test_usrp_standard_rx -D 128
> xfered 1.34e+08 bytes in 67.3 seconds. 1.996e+06 bytes/sec. cpu time =
> 1.312 noverruns = 16
>
> ./test_usrp_standard_rx -D 64
> xfered 1.34e+08 bytes in 33.6 seconds. 3.994e+06 bytes/sec. cpu tim
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 10:06:28AM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
>
> Don't use the -M option with small values. You won't get a good
> answer unless you let it run for 10 - 20 seconds or so. We want to
> know what it will sustain over an extended period of time. You'll
> probabably want to run eac
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 09:24:35AM -0500, LRK wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 12:35:50AM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
> > >
> > > I believe it was gnuradio-examples/python/usrp/benchmark_usb.py that
> > > triggered the problem here.
> >
> > That should be the right answer, but is not completely re
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 12:35:50AM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
> >
> > I believe it was gnuradio-examples/python/usrp/benchmark_usb.py that
> > triggered the problem here.
>
> That should be the right answer, but is not completely reliable.
Since I don't have a Tx board, I couldn't run that test
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:05, Eric Blossom wrote:
> > I believe it was gnuradio-examples/python/usrp/benchmark_usb.py that
> > triggered the problem here.
> >
> > cheerio Berndt
>
> That should be the right answer, but is not completely reliable.
>
> Try running test_usrp_standard_rx with different va
>
> I believe it was gnuradio-examples/python/usrp/benchmark_usb.py that
> triggered the problem here.
>
> cheerio Berndt
That should be the right answer, but is not completely reliable.
Try running test_usrp_standard_rx with different values of the
-D option. Start with -D 128, then try -D
-Original Message-
From: LRK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 13 October 2005 3:14 PM
To: Berndt Josef Wulf
Cc: Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] FreeBSD - more
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 02:50:46PM +0930, Berndt Josef Wulf wrote:
>> >> &g
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 02:50:46PM +0930, Berndt Josef Wulf wrote:
> >> > Progress but as always clues are welcome.
> >>
> >> Do NetBSD and FreeBSD use the same USB implementation?
> >
> > At least very similar. Berndt sent me a patch for the ugen.c code and it
> > looks similar at that point altho
>> > Progress but as always clues are welcome.
>>
>> Do NetBSD and FreeBSD use the same USB implementation?
>
> At least very similar. Berndt sent me a patch for the ugen.c code and it
> looks similar at that point although the line numbers don't match. The
> patch also did not seem to affect my pr
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 07:26:56PM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
> >
> > Disabling the ethernet interface seems to have some small effect on the
> > overruns while running the wfm code and listening to FM but they still do
> > hit occasionally and can be heard in the audio.
>
> You might try telling
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 11:55:41AM -0500, LRK wrote:
>
> I'm still in way over my head here but some progress:
>
>
> usrp_wfm_rcv(_nogui).py runs with either the Basic Rx or TV Rx board.
>
> Since most of the FM stations are 4 to 6 miles away, it is easy to get
> strong signals.
>
> I get uO
11 matches
Mail list logo
