On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 12:23:20PM -0700, Ben Green wrote:
>
>
>
> Eric Blossom wrote:
> >
> >
> > If you are trying to capture continuous data, there is no substitute
> > for a disk subsystem that can sustain the required throughput.
> >
>
> For capturing short segments (<500 MB raw data) i
Eric Blossom wrote:
>
>
> If you are trying to capture continuous data, there is no substitute
> for a disk subsystem that can sustain the required throughput.
>
>
For capturing short segments (<500 MB raw data) is a ram disk not
sufficient?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.na
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 09:05:56AM -0700, Ben Green wrote:
>
>
> Wuest Brandon-WTVR47 wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I got a few underruns during the "usrp_rx_cfile".
> >> About 10 in 10 seconds. The raw data file is 446 meg.
> >
> > Underruns are bad.
> >
> > Try capturing the data to a ram disk
Wuest Brandon-WTVR47 wrote:
>
>
>> I got a few underruns during the "usrp_rx_cfile".
>> About 10 in 10 seconds. The raw data file is 446 meg.
>
> Underruns are bad.
>
> Try capturing the data to a ram disk instead of your hard drive if you
> do not have a faster hard drive setup availab
> I got a few underruns during the "usrp_rx_cfile".
> About 10 in 10 seconds. The raw data file is 446 meg.
Underruns are bad.
Try capturing the data to a ram disk instead of your hard drive if you
do not have a faster hard drive setup available (i.e. RAID). I used the
ATSC demodulator a
