Thanks, Christophe and Jerry. Using the cos(x) wave makes sense, providing
a value of 1 and explains why I had a ridiculously small number when using
sin(x).
Next, I will try to output all the time domain signals onto one output sink
(spec-a) to keep the scaling the same and show the difference mo
of course twice not half.
Thanks Jerry and sorry for writing to fast without correcting
these evidences!
On 26/04/2021 16:58, geraldfenkell
wrote:
is it not: The sampling frequency must be twice the max
f
Hi James
Your first signal (upper branch) is one of those I like to show
to my students to explain the Nyquist sampling theorem.
1- As Daniel said, sampling frequency Fs must be higher than
half the maximum frequency Fmax: This is the Nyquist Sampling
It definitely helps, thank you. One thing I noticed, and don't know how to
address is why the ""Correctly Sampled Signal"" Time Sink shows the
amplitude on the nanoscale.My signal source has an amplitude of one and the
Time Sink should be displaying a range from -1 to 1.
I placed a rational resamp
El 25/4/21 a las 18:42, James Hayek escribió:
Apologies if I missed any response from my prior thread.
I wanted to elaborate more here, on what I am attempting to do.
The goal is to create a GRC file to show how sampling rates affect a
generated signal. Knowing, for real samples, fs (sampling r
