John Clark wrote:
> On the topic of Phil Karn... my 'contact' with that name was using the
> ancient AX-25/Packet Radio networking stacks of yore
> to do incredibly low speed networking (as a note my system in Florida
> was replacing a KA9Q based implementation...). So
> perhaps while now Karn may
Jeff Brower schrieb:
> Jordan-
>
>
>>> Phil Karn is a Qualcomm employee -- maybe not the most impartial
>>> source.
>>>
>> Hey, Jeff: welcome to the Internet. I see this must be your first day
>> :)
>>
>
> It seems like Phil has worked carefully and thoroughly to show areas of
> we
Jordan-
> > Phil Karn is a Qualcomm employee -- maybe not the most impartial
> > source.
>
> Hey, Jeff: welcome to the Internet. I see this must be your first day
> :)
It seems like Phil has worked carefully and thoroughly to show areas of
weakness --
or unexplained gaps -- in xG's approach an
Marcus-
> I couldn't find Jeffs response in my "discuss-gnuradio" archive, so I'm
> responding here.
>
> I've known Phil personally for many years (yikes, a couple of decades
> now!). I'd be utterly
> shocked to find him simply "spouting the company line".
>
> I've read his analysis, and tal
Charles Swiger wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 22:54 -0500, Jeff Brower wrote:
>
>> Michael-
>>
>>
>>> I think the most comprehensive page I've found is < http://
>>> en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XMax >. Links to patents and reviews (e.g.
>>> Phil Karn's). - MLD
>>>
>> Phil Karn is a Qualco
On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 22:54 -0500, Jeff Brower wrote:
> Michael-
>
> > I think the most comprehensive page I've found is < http://
> > en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XMax >. Links to patents and reviews (e.g.
> > Phil Karn's). - MLD
>
> Phil Karn is a Qualcomm employee -- maybe not the most impartial sou
Bah. Hate it when I forget to fix the "reply-to".
--- Begin Message ---
I remember seeing this elsewhere a while back. I recall two sticking points:
1. the technology appears to be related to pulse or "gated" modulation.
Sort of like continuous wave modulation on crack.
2. their marketing app
Jeff Brower writes:
Phil Karn is a Qualcomm employee -- maybe not the most impartial
source.
Hey, Jeff: welcome to the Internet. I see this must be your first day
:)
/jordan
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://l
Michael-
> I think the most comprehensive page I've found is < http://
> en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XMax >. Links to patents and reviews (e.g.
> Phil Karn's). - MLD
Phil Karn is a Qualcomm employee -- maybe not the most impartial source. Here
is
something recent, starting with an actual face-to-fac
I think the most comprehensive page I've found is < http://
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XMax >. Links to patents and reviews (e.g.
Phil Karn's). - MLD
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discus
Phil Karn has done a more recent analysis at
http://www.ka9q.net/xmax.html . This matches with my personal analysis
that it smells a bit like a reptile cage. They have been doing some more
press releases through Mobile Radio Technology Mag, claiming they are
close to a rollout.
Their claimed
Interesting however have a read of the following old Register article:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/11/09/xmax/
and
http://www.ka9q.net/xmax_schwartz.html
So, this appears to have been doing the rounds since mid 2005 but
apparently nothing concrete to show 2 years later.
Difficult to f
Apologies for general/off topicness, but does anybody have any
comments/opionion about these guys:
http://www.xgtechnology.com/technology.asp
Useful innovation or snake oil?
TIA
--Chuck
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
h
13 matches
Mail list logo
